News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Phoebus Cartel by amelius on Monday April 26, 2021 @06:02PM (#26948828)
A percentage doesn't make sense, because cheap apps and expensive apps require exactly the same effort for hosting them, and there is no risk involved.

So the fact that these competitors use the same pricing model and the same price has a bad smell.

Re:Phoebus Cartel by simonh on Monday April 26, 2021 @11:59PM (#26951854)
If the actual cost of service was pro rated across apps this would basically eliminate free and low cost apps. In fact how would you price this in the first few years of the App Store when it lost money? Furthermore it would make it incredibly expensive and therefore risky to develop launch an app. They would likely have had to charge hundreds of dollars, perhaps thousands per app in the early years, stifling innovation and strangling freemium or free offerings. The App Store would be a very, very different place today.

This would be like supermarkets charging product manufacturers a uniform fixed rental for shelf space. No supermarket would stock toilet paper, it’s too bulky and low revenue, or if they did they have to charge a lot more for it.

Re:Phoebus Cartel by amelius on Tuesday April 27, 2021 @09:41AM (#26955679)
So Apple and Google decided that expensive apps should subsidize the cheap ones? That sounds almost like a governmental move. I'd rather have the real government regulate the market I'm operating in.