News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by CBLT on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @05:34PM (#26731661)
To add a little extra context to what other people are giving you: large, million-dollar digital tournaments stream on Twitch because they have no other choice if they want to reach viewers. ESL signed a deal with Facebook streaming that destroyed their viewership numbers because people go to Twitch to watch, not the website for the tournament. Organizers have clearly seen this and will not move their stream to another provider unless a large amount of money changes hands (like Facebook sponsoring ESL).

Additionally, Twitch will not allow banned users to appear on other streams including tournament streams. There was a kerfluffle recently where a Twitch-banned player was also banned from a tournament they tried to compete in, solely because the tournament organizer didn't want to jeopardize their streamability.

I hope I've impressed upon you that a Twitch ban is effectively a ban on all opportunities that involve money in the esports scene. There are incredibly few esports careers that could survive a Twitch ban, and not a single one would be unaffected.

Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by ohazi on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:09PM (#26732074)
> no other choice if they want to reach viewers

> are incredibly few esports careers that could survive a Twitch ban

(emphasis mine)

People have never been entitled to a sports career, or to celebrity status by reaching viewers on someone else's platform. These platforms have democratized the "rags to riches" story, but whether it was the '30s or the '60s or the '90s, you've always had to play by the rules of the prevailing media empire. This is no different.

Companies are generally allowed to set arbitrary criteria for who they're willing to work with. There are some very specific exceptions around discrimination against a very short list of protected classes. Other than that, rules restricting conduct are usually legal. Note that I'm not claiming that rules like these are moral, I'm just pointing out that they're usually found to be legal when challenged.

The fact that you can sign up for an account in your bedroom in pajamas instead of signing documents at a lawyer's office in Hollywood doesn't magically make this a public square subject to a different set of rules.

Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by beaner on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:30PM (#26732321)
No, it just means your eligibility for a professional career may come down to whether or not a random mod on a streaming platform simply thinks it's "funny" to ban you.
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by ativzzz on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @07:18PM (#26732865)
Then maybe you should reconsider your choice of professional careers if that's a risk factor and your risk tolerance isn't high enough.
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by beaner on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @07:29PM (#26732994)
Imagine this response in the context of a sport like the NBA. If the ref is secretly racist and bans you from the sport because it's "funny" as their excuse, would you react this way? The nature of videogames doesn't make the professional sport of them juvenile and less worthy of rigorous standards for inclusion.
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by ativzzz on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @07:35PM (#26733042)
The NBA is an organization who's job it is to set rules that teams, athletes, and referees can participate in. They can choose to fire refs who behave this way, and they would because they make more money if the refs aren't racists (especially now that they're getting more into racial activism)

Twitch is basically the NBA of their streaming platform, as in they set rules for how streamers, viewers, and moderators interact. Twitch can create whatever arbitrary rules it wants to maximize their revenue. If advertisers stopped caring about controversy, or if Twitch suddenly found a better revenue source, they would surely pursue it.

Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by malandrew on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @08:03PM (#26733260)
The irony of your comment is that once upon a time, these professional sports leagues made more money by being actively racist and excluding people of color from their leagues lest they upset their white fan base.
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by ativzzz on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @08:44PM (#26733662)
I don't know how long ago "once upon a time is" but they seem to have increasing revenue very successfully since the 80s at the least based on some googling. Maybe before then, but I don't know if we can find any data to support that.
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by beaner on Thursday April 08, 2021 @11:53AM (#26740301)
Your analogy is wrong, and so was mine. It is not the refs banning players, it would be the television sports broadcasters. Makes even less sense.
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by CBLT on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:38PM (#26732424)
Pretend Harvey Weinstein is talking to you. And that he's reading the top-most comment (by newbie789) on this story: that he owns the company, so he can ban you at his discretion. Or gaslight you. Or show you shock porn. That this is fine, because it's how its always worked here.

I'll tentatively assume you got some of the same visceral recoil I got from that mental image. And that we agree that following everything Hollywood does is probably not for the best. So I'll ask you: if you could solve this however you'd like (by passing laws, let's say), how would you do it?

Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by ohazi on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @07:01PM (#26732673)
FWIW, I agree with you about the visceral recoil, thoughts about Hollywood practices not being ideal, etc. I'm not trying to claim that this state of affairs is good, just that it's basically identical to what we've had previously, and that the relevant laws don't appear to be affected by unprecedented scale or automation.

Passing laws to address this might work, but I think it would be difficult, and I would expect them to be challenged mercilessly. In order to actually work, I think this would require "Civil Rights Act" or "Equal Employment Opportunity Act" caliber landmark legislation, and I'm skeptical that this would be politically tenable any time soon.

Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by kansface on Thursday April 08, 2021 @02:04AM (#26735568)
I wholeheartedly disagree about the current state of affairs. Our relationship to the internet has profoundly changed. It’s deeply entwined in our daily life, inescapably so, in exactly the same way that forums were not.
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by wongarsu on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:40PM (#26732440)
But it does elevate Twitch bans far above the "this is just like a forum admin doing as he pleases, move along" of the original comment.
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by max1984_2 on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:45PM (#26732501)
I can't stand comments like this that obviously miss the overall point being made and tbh it is entirely done disingenuously.

The terms of service are not in anyway enforced consistently or fairly. The way the terms and service is written is that they can basically boot you for any reason. It is well known that the "tiddie streamers" regularly get away with ToS violations, where some dude wearing a red hat will get a ban (and I mean a red hat, because that exactly what happened to one guy, he didn't even have a MAGA hat).

"Behaviour off platform" can mean anything and will be like the current Terms of Service be not be enforced in any manner that is consistent or fair.

Twitch is a monopoly in this space and it is abusing its position. This combined with the fact that the mobile phone platforms can remove an App for any reason it wants means that there is no open market where a competitor that has a different ToS can reasonably become competitive.

Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by _jal on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @05:57PM (#26731914)
> a Twitch ban is effectively a ban on all opportunities that involve money in the esports scene.

I suggest you ask Colin Kaepernick about how it is in the non-'E' sports world.

(Edit: misspelled name)

Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by exolymph on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:07PM (#26732049)
The dude who landed a big advertising campaign with Nike based on his high-profile activism?
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by bilbo0s on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:15PM (#26732156)
In other words, he changed his line of work from a "sports athlete" to a "marketing guy".

The esports guys should take note at what happens to sports athletes who behave "badly". They typically don't get to participate in sports anymore.

Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by bilbo0s on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:04PM (#26732009)
This is what I don't understand?

People are complaining about something that has been happening since literally forever. Long before Gopher and Mosaic were even released. Why is it "bad" now? The answer is that it is not bad, it's just that it now affects them.

Here's the thing though, waiting until it affects you, is a very poor strategy for changing what you consider to be a "wrong". This has all been litigated at this point. Now your only recourse is a wholesale change of the laws, which is not going to happen.

Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by anamexis on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @05:58PM (#26731936)
I assume you mean Colin Kaepernick.
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by _jal on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:03PM (#26732001)
Thanks.
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by jonwachob91 on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:23PM (#26732253)
Plenty of major streamers would tell you them switch to YouTube did more good for their careers than twitch.

ValkyRae, CourageJD, DrDisrespect, Anish Giri are some just off the top of my head.

Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by rm_-rf_slash on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @05:38PM (#26731697)
In a way you have affirmed parent’s point: it’s the shareholders’ website, and they can mod it as they wish.
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by weird-eye-issue on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @05:46PM (#26731784)
You just completely missed the point. Everyone knows who's website it is and that they "can" mod it as they wish. But at a certain scale some moral and ethical questions come into play.
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by onethought on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:02PM (#26731986)
Isn’t this just like other sports, where a star is pilloried for some indiscretion outside of their sport which can result in them being dropped from a team etc?
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by weird-eye-issue on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:19PM (#26732203)
That is up to the team though. This is closer to a TV station banning somebody so now they can't compete in a sport that will be broadcast on that station, forcing the team to kick them off.
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by madeofpalk on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:29PM (#26732312)
Shouldn’t a TV station be able to decide whether they want to promote a pedophile?
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by weird-eye-issue on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:33PM (#26732350)
That is sort of the start of a strawman argument because Twitch bans for a lot of things, not just being a convicted pedophile. But even in that case I don't think it is fair to completely disallow somebody from appearing on a TV network. That also isn't what I would consider "promotion".
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by madeofpalk on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:40PM (#26732441)
I don’t know if it’s a straw man when the actual policy this article is about mentions it

> The company is currently defining “serious offenses” as incidents of violent extremism, credible threats of mass violence, membership in a known hate group, sexual exploitation of children, and nonconsensual sexual activities, among others.

Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by weird-eye-issue on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:43PM (#26732476)
That is for actions off of Twitch. You can get banned for actions on Twitch that are not bad at all or completely accidental
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by michaelmrose on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:34PM (#26732369)
Which effectively can also happen now. In fact the athlete is likely wealthy and will be ok despite his career crashing. This could in fact happen to the guy who waits on tables down town.

If he became internet infamous and the tv station covers it the business he works at might be obliged to fire him.

Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by romwell on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:35PM (#26732377)
>This is closer to a TV station banning somebody

So the FCC won't let me be, or let me be me, so let me see...

Yeah, TV stations (like MTV) have been banning people in the past too.

Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by onethought on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @08:35PM (#26733564)
Like how Lance Armstrong was banned for from professional sport for life for "not a crime"?
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by weird-eye-issue on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @08:51PM (#26733705)
That was up to the sporting agencies though right? Not some third party network
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by onethought on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @08:55PM (#26733733)
USADA is the definition of a third party is it not? He was banned from ALL sports, not just cycling. So it would be like Twitch banning you from YouTube as well.
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by weird-eye-issue on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @09:56PM (#26734176)
Like I said it is a sporting agency. Not some TV network or something. Sports aren't forced to cooperate with USADA but they do it for the good of the sport. That doesn't apply with Twitch at all.
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by rm_-rf_slash on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @10:02PM (#26734233)
I didn’t miss the point, I just have a different opinion.
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by rodgerd on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @05:54PM (#26731890)
Well, then eSports stars are getting to be just like regular sports stars.
Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by CBLT on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:01PM (#26731974)
I'm okay with that. I think sports approaches this with the appropriate level of maturity. Has any sports exec said something to the effect of

> I can also ban you if I don’t like you. Or if I think it’s funny, or really any other reason.

Re:Twitch will ban users for 'severe misconduct' that occurs... by pc86 on Wednesday April 07, 2021 @06:43PM (#26732484)
If they weren't dealing with dozens of 7- and 8-figure contracts, and earning millions themselves, but were instead moderating some piddly little forum nobody's ever heard for approximately $0 a year, they probably would have said almost exactly that.