The big problem with such a setup, of course, is that the application itself would be running inside a JVM/Dalvik VM, so the app would constantly be switching between Java and native, which can't be great for performance. However, it can be done; thankfully, Chrome and Firefox aren't completely compiled to byte code, the JIT and rendering code is written in native code. With Mozilla's use of Rust in their browser, that means that there's already a significant Rust runtime running on Android, at least.

If the app uses Rust and a library to hook the draw call, it should be fairly easy to write the app like a video game and render everything in Rust. This would come bundled with a tonne of accessibility problems, of course, as every rendered control would be a non-standard one.

I've put a lot of time into learning Rust and I still reach for Java for high level stuff. GC is just wonderful for developer productivity. Lifetimes are way better than C but still a PITA.

Especially when you mix with threading, you end up using Reference Counting anyways which is just shitty GC.

I maybe break out rust-gdb once a year. My code has fewer bugs than ever, thanks to extensive use of the high-quality modeling tools (types and lifetimes) provided by the language. My main project for the last year has had a grand total of one logic bug that was caught after release.

It also has an inclusive community: at the last RustConf, half the speakers were nonbinary and/or transgender. I fit both those criteria and feel more welcome in the Rust community than in that of any other language, meaning that I can do my best work in Rust.

Just to clarify, I'm asking with good intent.

The Rust community has many nonbinary and transgender people in it, and speakers are selected from the community. The selection process for RustConf is blind so the talks were picked for their merit: it just so happened that half of the speakers weren't cis.

> rust is a very unique community

Yes, this is true in my experience.

One thing I will say is that my general impression from afar is that Europeans are generally a lot more tolerant of the state interfering in personal identity issues than the liberal parts of the US. Iceland used to have a fixed list of approved baby names for example, something unimaginable in the US.

The situation was made better in 2019: https://www.icelandreview.com/news/icelandic-names-will-no-l...

It varies from acceptance of an adult just being trans, of trans babies, of schools preaching medical transition without parent approval, and of issue of bathroom usage and sex-segregated prisons.

Regardless of the political questions presumably Swedes are fairly liberal about someone's personal choices.

Put another way and exaggerated wildly for hopeful clarity, if person A became an expert despite being shoved away, and person B was wooed into the group, had tutors, friends,... I'd be more interested in A's talk than B's.

Memory safety is a big deal for writing secure programs, which has been repeatedly shown to be impossible to do at scale in C++. Provably safe parallelism and concurrency is key for performance on multi core devices, also extremely difficult to do safely and correctly in C++.

If C++ is the wheel being reinvented, it's not much of a wheel.

I'm not even going to say why because it would be a huge rant. It improves on C++ in virtually every way. Every feature you have in C++, Rust does it better. Every feature you wish C++ had, Rust has it.

I agree with you on Kotlin. It's better than Java on paper, but in much the same ways Groovy already was. And the advantages are shrinking in new versions of Java, especially if you use Lombok.

How does one perform generic fold expressions in Rust lang ? (Possible in C++ 17 and above)

https://foonathan.net/2020/05/fold-tricks/ https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/fold

IDK. I miss variadic functions (not macros) and being able to do certain simple things without resorting to strange paradigms, like arbitrarily closing an std::fs::File without needing to go out of scope or calling drop. Things like that.

Why “drop” is the opposite of “open”? Let’s change “open” for “lift” or “notdrop”.

It's hard not being sarcastic in reply to this. But no, this did not happen.

An other approach would be to employ one of many thin webview wrappers, in which your app is HTML+Js+CSS. When such a webview wrapper supports WASM, the JS part could be written in rust.

Not something I'd do other than "to prove it can be done".

But, TBH, I think Kotlin and Java are _indeed_ fine application languages.

What Rust is already quite often used for is for libraries that work on both iOS and Android. For a public example, see the Glean SDK: https://mozilla.github.io/glean/book/index.html

I agree wholeheartedly.

But there will be a demographic of people who know Rust and not Java, but who might want to build an app. Somewhat similar to how there is an apparent need for "HTML+JS+CSS"-devs to build native apps.

I'm not sure if the argument for "HTML+JS+CSS" is purely familiarity, there's also technical arguments like portability and future-compatibility. But I _do_ hope that the portability story will become better in the coming years beyond just this stack.