News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pollution from fossil fuel combustion deadlier than previ... by zetazzed on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @06:36PM (#26573891)
Our grandchildren will look at old films of people blithely walking around next to internal combustion vehicles and laugh in mild horror, much as we look back on images of parents puffing away on cigarettes next to a child.
Re:Pollution from fossil fuel combustion deadlier than previ... by annoyingnoob on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @06:48PM (#26574011)
My dad smoked 2 pack a day, I hated it. He was an early riser and by the time I got out of bed there was a haze hanging in the kitchen/dining room, everyday for most of my childhood.

On the bright side, I wanted nothing to do with cigarettes from a young age.

I took the family to Europe in 2019, in terms of smokers and smoking it was like going back in time compared to the US.

Re:Pollution from fossil fuel combustion deadlier than previ... by jacquesm on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @06:55PM (#26574095)
That depends very much on which country you visit.
Re:Pollution from fossil fuel combustion deadlier than previ... by samatman on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @08:18PM (#26574890)
It does, if you count Sweden at 8% of adults.

I figure it's because of snus, which is smart on them; I'll always have a soft spot for the stuff, because it got me off cigarettes.

Every other country in the EU has a higher adult smoking rate than the 14% in the US; second place is UK at 17%.

Re:Pollution from fossil fuel combustion deadlier than previ... by tonyedgecombe on Thursday March 25, 2021 @05:46AM (#26578147)
There has been a remarkable decline in the UK, I assume it's similar elsewhere:

https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-...

Re:Pollution from fossil fuel combustion deadlier than previ... by thatwasunusual on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @08:40PM (#26575105)
It also depends on where you come from. As an example, US is also 14%-ish smokers.
Re:Pollution from fossil fuel combustion deadlier than previ... by vitus on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @10:58PM (#26576059)
Well, it also depends where in the US you come from.

California is 11%, West Virginia is 25%. I'm sure the disparities are even greater when you look at smaller populations (e.g. county, metro, city, etc).

https://www.cdc.gov/statesystem/cigaretteuseadult.html

Re:Pollution from fossil fuel combustion deadlier than previ... by peferron on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @08:59PM (#26575270)
> I took the family to Europe in 2019, in terms of smokers and smoking it was like going back in time compared to the US.

Last time we went back to France, we took the kid to the playground and adults were smoking a few meters away from the slides. After double-checking that there was indeed a sign indicating that smoking was forbidden, I told them to step and they did, but apparently nobody else cared.

I haven't see that happen yet in the SF Bay. Obviously though, we get wildfire smoke for several months, and right after that people start burning wood in their open fireplaces for winter, so it's not all rosy either.

Re:Pollution from fossil fuel combustion deadlier than previ... by Igelau on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @08:43PM (#26575132)
I almost took up smoking so I could get into a higher vaccine phase. The irony of smoking for my own health! Thankfully I was able to find a clinic that had an unexpected opening and no arm to put the thawed out shot into.
Re:Pollution from fossil fuel combustion deadlier than previ... by floren on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @07:38PM (#26574525)
Go to a car show and get a whiff of some pre-1970s cars driving around. Now imagine if every car on the road was like that. I can't imagine the stench of a city before the introduction of catalytic converters.
Re:Pollution from fossil fuel combustion deadlier than previ... by fuzzfactor on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @11:13PM (#26576175)
You should have gotten a whiff Baton Rouge in the 1970's.

With the large refinery making fuel for far more vehicles than this one moderate-sized city could ever use.

And with orders of magnitude more emissions than the same noticeably smelly facilities today.

Re:Pollution from fossil fuel combustion deadlier than previ... by annoyingnoob on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @08:18PM (#26574891)
Worse the gasoline was leaded. Plus gas stations did not have vapor recovery systems and gas stations were pretty stinky places.
Re:Pollution from fossil fuel combustion deadlier than previ... by ic0n0cl4st on Wednesday March 24, 2021 @08:02PM (#26574744)
Looking at pictures of highways from before caralytic converters and you notice that each lane had a pure black stripe from the exhaust.