News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Node.js is Backwards by nzoschke on Monday June 13, 2011 @08:26PM (#2651312)
I love Node for many things, but I agree with this sentiment.

At work, every time we undertake a project in Node, it just doesn't work at scale, and it has to get re-implemented in Erlang.

A lot of this is for personnel reasons. To all of us Node is a neat new toy, where a few engineers are Erlang wizards. If Node crashes we don't have any experience debugging it. If it locks up there's little intuition why.

Can people point to examples of large production Node deployments?

Re:Node.js is Backwards by daleharvey on Tuesday June 14, 2011 @07:07AM (#2652528)
Re:Node.js is Backwards by ricardobeat on Tuesday June 14, 2011 @08:53AM (#2652745)
Putting it in words for those too lazy to click: node.js is built into webOS.
Re:Node.js is Backwards by weixiyen on Monday June 13, 2011 @09:48PM (#2651495)
plurk
Re:Node.js is Backwards by alnayyir on Monday June 13, 2011 @11:06PM (#2651659)
Not large and not Node.
Re:Node.js is Backwards by benatkin on Monday June 13, 2011 @11:58PM (#2651743)
Re:Node.js is Backwards by alnayyir on Tuesday June 14, 2011 @12:10AM (#2651762)
That's not their backend, it's just servicing a front-end feature.
Re:Node.js is Backwards by weixiyen on Tuesday June 14, 2011 @04:03AM (#2652186)
It's doing what normally Erlang would have been used for, which answers the original question. It's a node.js deployment, and very early version one at that. I'm not really sure what your point is.
Re:Node.js is Backwards by ricardobeat on Tuesday June 14, 2011 @08:52AM (#2652740)
Plurk actually gave up on node after failing to optimize their service and went back to Netty (http://amix.dk/blog/post/19577). A better answer is this: https://github.com/joyent/node/wiki/Projects,-Applications,-...