News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Receiving SpaceX Falcon 9 Telemetry with a HackRF and 1.2... by BenjiWiebe on Thursday March 11, 2021 @09:25AM (#26424295)
Spoofing is extremely difficult when you are pointing a highly directional dish antenna up into the air at a rocket.
Re:Receiving SpaceX Falcon 9 Telemetry with a HackRF and 1.2... by dylan604 on Thursday March 11, 2021 @10:53AM (#26425315)
Not if you're SR Hadden.

I have been curious on what it would take to do a Contact like signal fake. Would it be possible for a satellite to be launched into a direction in space that for all intensive purpose make it look like it is coming from somewhere else further away? Would it be easy to tell that it is originating much closer than what it is simulating? How far would it need to be away from earth before it was believable, and then would the fact the signal's source is constantly moving futher away be discernible from the signal itself? Basically, think along the lines of a fanfic premise told from Michael Kitz' perspective.

Re:Receiving SpaceX Falcon 9 Telemetry with a HackRF and 1.2... by sandworm101 on Thursday March 11, 2021 @12:24PM (#26426544)
>> Would it be possible for a satellite to be launched into a direction in space that for all intensive purpose make it look like it is coming from somewhere else further away?

Anything is possible but it would be very hard. You would have to fake the doppler shifts. With massive scrutiny you might even have to fake some absorption lines. Then, if the signal was longer than a few days/weeks, you would need to place the emitter far enough away that parallax, relative motion against the stellar background, was undetectable. That distance is probably measured in light-years.