News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Falling sperm counts, declining egg quality, and endocrin... by calvinmorrison on Tuesday February 23, 2021 @11:51AM (#26239514)
"Some of this bias may be for good intentions (allowing less fertile couples to conceive) while some may have questionable outcomes (selection based purely on socioeconomic status)."

First let's not anthropomorphize nature, or natural selection. But secondly, in 1st world countries, the more money you make, the less likely you are to have kids! We've done a terrible job at incentivizing couples to have kids since women have entered and made up a good part of the work force, and it's hard to blame someone in a good career, married to someone in a good career, to take off 10-15 prime years of their lives to have children.

I think that waiting to have children until later (late 20's to early 30's) is a big problem in terms of fertility and successful child bearing. Unfortunately the human clock doesn't really jive with the "4 years of college, work a bit and then think about marriage and kids".

I don't have a conclusion except we might want to think about increasing the birth rates among high and medium earners in our populations where they are struggling, lest we become like Japan or other countries (some in Europe which depend on importing labor in order to satisfy demand)

Re:Falling sperm counts, declining egg quality, and endocrin... by flerchin on Tuesday February 23, 2021 @12:21PM (#26239961)
I feel like a wealthier and wealthier population, slowly shrinking, might be the sustainable future we need. Yes there will be challenges, but geometric, or even linear, population growth of the human species is not sustainable.
Re:Falling sperm counts, declining egg quality, and endocrin... by DoingIsLearning on Tuesday February 23, 2021 @03:49PM (#26242676)
I am not necessarily disagreeing but you're description matches closely to one of the distopian worlds in Asimov's Foundation Series.

'Solaria' is this planet of abundance with strict population controls and where robots do all the hard work and wealthy generation for their owners.

Re:Falling sperm counts, declining egg quality, and endocrin... by greenonions on Tuesday February 23, 2021 @12:19PM (#26239927)
Shocking to think that our society would discount the future for the present...

On a serious note however, babies and a growing population is an enormous advantage to a nation. I would think it would be massively popular to increase benefits to those who are having children. Full disclosure, I found out my wife is pregnant yesterday, but still.

Re:Falling sperm counts, declining egg quality, and endocrin... by tenebrisalietum on Tuesday February 23, 2021 @02:35PM (#26241794)
Babies and a growing population is an enormous advantage only if there are enough resources for everyone and they are distributed in such a form that does not end up cause social infighting. Otherwise it just contributes to instability.

There are also women who are infertile due to no fault of their own (e.g. cancer, etc.), why should they be excluded from any resources whatsoever due to something that is not their fault?

Re:Falling sperm counts, declining egg quality, and endocrin... by omilu on Tuesday February 23, 2021 @08:51PM (#26245638)
>There are also women who are infertile due to no fault of their own (e.g. cancer, etc.), why should they be excluded from any resources whatsoever due to something that is not their fault?

For the greater good of others, taking one for the team.

Re:Falling sperm counts, declining egg quality, and endocrin... by souprock on Tuesday February 23, 2021 @09:18PM (#26245832)
Nobody is excluded from any resources. Every person gains the benefit when they are a child.
Re:Falling sperm counts, declining egg quality, and endocrin... by irscott on Tuesday February 23, 2021 @12:36PM (#26240174)
Hey congratulations!
Re:Falling sperm counts, declining egg quality, and endocrin... by greenonions on Tuesday February 23, 2021 @01:45PM (#26241097)
Thank you!