Could you share some resources with more information on this- how does it increase granularity?

Here's Verizon's explainer [1] about how 5G works. Basically, since the frequencies needed to transmit large amounts of data are so high (28 - 39 GHz millimeter wavelength bands), the signal does not reach as far as a 4G tower. Therefore, a higher density of towers is needed (500 feet apart to effectively penetrate buildings [2]), allowing for higher granularity cell-phone triangulation/tracking as a by-product.

[1] https://www.verizon.com/about/news/how-far-does-5g-reach

[2] https://www.celltowerleaseexperts.com/cell-tower-lease-news/...

So it's not a protocol change from 4G, it's just the higher density of access points allowing for more granularity. Gotcha.

Well GPS is 1.2 to 1.5GZ and you can get accuracy to a few meters easily. I have a higher end module that gets down to a meter[1]. Seems obvious that G4 which uses roughly same frequencies but with cell towers vastly closer than a GPS satellite could get 1M.

[1] Give it a few minutes and it'll pin point where my desk is inside my office.

GPS does not use triangulation.

It does some real dark arts physics wizardry to compute a position. Nothing like that can be done for cell phone signals.

Technically it's not triangulation, it's trilateration.

But the math is not significantly harder. The only meaningful quirk is that without a perfect clock you don't know the exact distances to each satellite, instead you have distances a+n, b+n, c+n, etc. Still though, you're just looking for the spot where your numbers line up. There's no wizardry in the "compute a position" part of GPS.

OK, I looked it up, and the GPS system is a different and simpler from what I thought I heard.

In the end the math is indeed similar, but how it gets there is quite different.

For one thing, each satellite carries an atomic clock to make things work. And the receiver locates itself by listening to signals, while triangulation is several receivers working together to locate a transmitter.

I will note that you could make the system work fine without an atomic clock on the satellites. There are circuits that can keep a good enough sync to a ground-based reference. It would just be annoying.

Both GPS receivers and cell phone towers use the same basic approach based on the time it takes for the signal to travel between transmitter and receiver.

The only substantial difference is that in case of GPS the calculation happens on the receiver side (GPS signals only go in one direction), while cellular service providers calculate time advance on the tower side.

AFAIK, cell towers don't even calculate phone position beyond what's needed to determine which tower should handle it.

Maybe there is an element of triangulation in that, but it's far less precise and ambitious than GPS.

Cell tower needs to know timing advance [1] (how long it takes for the signal to travel between the tower and the handset) to make sure signals from different handsets do not overlap.

Once you know which tower the phone is connected to, coordinates of that tower, antenna pattern, and distance (from timing advance and speed of light), you can calculate approximate cell phone location.

You get more data if the phone moves or propagation changes and phone changes towers. In urban environment with many towers location obtained this way can be very precise. Not as good as GPS, but good enough to within a block.

This is a simplification. Real systems also use signal strength, take into account multipath propagation, and apply some filtering from physical constraints (how fast a cell phone can move).

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timing_advance

OK, I didn't know about "timing advance". Obviously that gives at least a radius from the tower.

Your link is for GSM and states a 550 meter resolution, but I tried looking up LTE and I think it said 10 meters there.

I also understand modern (maybe next generation) towers will use directional transmission to avoid sending signals in all directions. Even if that's a 20° beam, that narrows don't the location by a lot.

Isn't it still triangulation, just accounting for relativity?

You need to lock with multiple satellites, I assumed this was for triangulation.

> GPS does not use triangulation.

LOL

Who the hell has a 5G device?

Is this....a serious question? All new iPhones are 5G compatible for the start and they sell millions, and loads of other manufacturers have released 5G compatible phones. In fact I'd risk a guess that if you bought a phone in the last 12 months it's likely to be a 5G compatible phone.

I bought a Pixel4 in March 2020 :(

Assuming you meant Pixel 4a, that one does not have 5G. The "4a 5G" model does, though, but it came out later in the year.

No, the regular Pixel4. No 5g.

Probably anyone that has signed a contract that came with a free phone in the last year and a half, anyone upgrading iPhones.

Lower cost prepaid carriers are also pushing 5G phones heavily (albeit somewhat crappy ones), and offering them for free.

It doesn’t matter if you have a 5G device, it is a function of the increased tower density. Those towers are capable of the old frequencies, too.

Alot of people buy new Iphones.

You don't even need iPhones - most of the cheap prepaid brands that you'd see next to a payday loan shop are offering Samsung's lower grade phones or OnePlus 5G phones for free if you set up autopay (it's locked to that carrier). Of course it comes with even more privacy-violating bloatware than ever, but still - 5G is no longer a rarity or expensive.

I’m guessing people who flew into DC on a weekday are more likely than average to own a decent smartphone. QAnon folk don’t seem to avoid mainstream technology in the quantity HN users do.