News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Baby girl born from record-setting 27-year-old embryo by im3w1l on Thursday December 03, 2020 @12:28AM (#25285719)
We will evolve a lot more in the coming 500 years than we have in the past 500 years. There might not even be recognizable humans around anymore except for some backwards savages in a reservation.
Re:Baby girl born from record-setting 27-year-old embryo by danielheath on Thursday December 03, 2020 @12:42AM (#25285804)
What do you think is going to kill enough people to create such an unprecedented selection pressure?
Re:Baby girl born from record-setting 27-year-old embryo by im3w1l on Thursday December 03, 2020 @12:47AM (#25285832)
We will deliberately genetically engineer ourselves.
Re:Baby girl born from record-setting 27-year-old embryo by danielheath on Thursday December 03, 2020 @01:16AM (#25286007)
A few people, I have no doubt. When do you think even half the population will be willing and able to afford doing it?

The desperate poor aren’t going anywhere.

Re:Baby girl born from record-setting 27-year-old embryo by BurningFrog on Thursday December 03, 2020 @01:37AM (#25286148)
When/if the engineered kids turn out to be really great people, most parents will want them.

Desperate poverty is rapidly disappearing across the world. Look it up!

Re:Baby girl born from record-setting 27-year-old embryo by v4dok on Thursday December 03, 2020 @03:09AM (#25286707)
It does, but that doesn't mean that the masses will be able to afford it. Its like you've never seen a cyberpunk dystopia scenario. Honestly, this is I think for now our default.
Re:Baby girl born from record-setting 27-year-old embryo by tomp on Thursday December 03, 2020 @03:59AM (#25287010)
It’s actually the other way around. Women’s hips are getting narrower because the women that used to die at birth (because of too narrow hips) now survive with Caesarean cuts.
Re:Baby girl born from record-setting 27-year-old embryo by neetrain on Thursday December 03, 2020 @12:51AM (#25285854)
When genetic screening becomes common, gene-based persecution and holocaust can happen maybe?
Re:Baby girl born from record-setting 27-year-old embryo by astrange on Thursday December 03, 2020 @01:06AM (#25285945)
Since most mutations are bad for you, wouldn't you want to screen for fewer mutations and end up with less change?

I doubt we'll figure out how to do genetic reprogramming on people. It seems like patching a few SNPs isn't going to do much.

Re:Baby girl born from record-setting 27-year-old embryo by bserge on Thursday December 03, 2020 @05:53AM (#25287669)
Unless everyone starts modifying newborns, it's more like everything around us will evolve more in the coming 500 years and would be unrecognizable to us from now.

Our own evolution is slow, but because of our numbers and tech, we're modifying everything around us at an unbelievable pace.

Re:Baby girl born from record-setting 27-year-old embryo by HarryHirsch on Thursday December 03, 2020 @12:35AM (#25285759)
Hopefully the Falklands will still be around.
Re:Baby girl born from record-setting 27-year-old embryo by neetrain on Thursday December 03, 2020 @12:42AM (#25285801)
There will be no selection pressure.

As long as whether you can survive and make children is independent from your gene, Evolution never occurs.

Re:Baby girl born from record-setting 27-year-old embryo by est31 on Thursday December 03, 2020 @12:53AM (#25285869)
There is still selection pressure today, not because you are too weak physically to make children, but because of sexual selection. Many people have a hard time finding a partner, often due to genetic issues. On the other hand, many people have genetic traits that help making them highly attractive and able to give their genes to many people.

So selection is still around, but nowadays we select for different things than nature used to when medicine wasn't as well developed as it is today.

Note that this selection alone won't cause any genetic change faster than what existed in the past. What really accelerates changes in the gene pool is us deliberately doing them. We'll start with eliminating hereditary diseases, but I don't think we'll stop there. We'll likely study which genetic variants give rise to desirable traits and then make those mutations to upcoming children of interested individuals.