News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I asked GPT-3 for the question to “42” by Cthulhu_ on Wednesday November 25, 2020 @03:27AM (#25207070)
Cynically, it'll probably end up being used to generate content for websites and online marketing.
Re:I asked GPT-3 for the question to “42” by sebmellen on Wednesday November 25, 2020 @03:27AM (#25207072)
It already is, and I regret to admit I've used it.

Check out https://copysmith.ai or https://shortlyread.com.

Re:I asked GPT-3 for the question to “42” by danielscrubs on Wednesday November 25, 2020 @09:17AM (#25209432)
I wonder if English will be the first to become a low trusted language as most AI research is done on the English language. “Is it in english? Probably written by a bot.” might be a common thought in ten years. Ofc eventually the big languages will catch up in marketing spam.
Re:I asked GPT-3 for the question to “42” by duck2 on Wednesday November 25, 2020 @10:46AM (#25210408)
If this future happens, people might "fall back" to their native languages for internet writing. I'm already thinking about this: if I wrote something which could potentially get me in legal trouble, like a reverse engineering post, I would probably write it in my native language. Kind of similar to torrent trackers in Russian or obscure phone mod forums in Portuguese.
Re:I asked GPT-3 for the question to “42” by patrickk on Wednesday November 25, 2020 @07:37AM (#25208552)
Are the results any good? Can it really generate quality copy? How is it for research on any given topic?
Re:I asked GPT-3 for the question to “42” by yreg on Wednesday November 25, 2020 @03:36AM (#25207124)
Even worse, armies of GPT-3s probably wage massive flamewars against each other all over the internet in an attempt to sway public opinion.

It was always inevitable though.

Re:I asked GPT-3 for the question to “42” by TeMPOraL on Wednesday November 25, 2020 @04:19AM (#25207355)
Yeah. And while GPT-3 output is often nonsensical, it's nonsensical in the same way a good fraction of the general public writes on the Internet. In this way, it's close to passing the Turing test - not because its good, but because real humans on generic platforms[0] are really that bad.

--

[0] - By that I mean platforms that aren't strongly moderated for quality of discussions, or that don't focus on niches for which the set of people interested in them already has a higher than average discourse quality.

Re:I asked GPT-3 for the question to “42” by SurfingToad on Wednesday November 25, 2020 @11:52AM (#25211257)
Locke versus Demosthenes ...