Re:Apple Silicon M1 chip in MacBook Air outperforms high-end...
by mirekrusin on Thursday November 12, 2020 @01:15AM
(#25067010)
The average user was spending peanuts on phone before iPhone. They also had 0% market for phones.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple Silicon M1 chip in MacBook Air outperforms high-end...
by michaelmrose on Thursday November 12, 2020 @03:07AM
(#25067601)
The average user was spending a very modest amount to be able to call and send text messages. Little portable multi function computers already cost hundreds of dollars.
Iphone helped clarify what a good interface looked like while prices came down and performance went up positioning themselves well as a product category that was already a thing became mainstream.
Laptops aren't a new category and the majority will continue to buy something other than apple in large part because of the price.
Re:Apple Silicon M1 chip in MacBook Air outperforms high-end...
by dingaling on Thursday November 12, 2020 @01:32AM
(#25067080)
> The average user was spending peanuts on phone before iPhone.
The iPhone was mid-range at launch, $499 versus $730 for a contemporary smartphone like the N95
Re:Apple Silicon M1 chip in MacBook Air outperforms high-end...
by bredren on Thursday November 12, 2020 @02:07AM
(#25067268)
This was not what it felt like when it debuted.
Blackberry was the competing “smart” phone [1] and the newest releases were we under half the price of iPhone w the same 2-year discount.
I had the blackberry curve myself at that time and iPhone seemed way high-priced.
[1] https://techcrunch.com/2007/07/25/iphone-v-blackberry-side-b...
Re:Apple Silicon M1 chip in MacBook Air outperforms high-end...
by Nullabillity on Thursday November 12, 2020 @04:09AM
(#25067947)
Guess it depends on the region. Here in Sweden I saw a few N95s and of Sony Ericsson and Nokia feature phones. Not a single Blackberry in sight, before or after.