The commons are full of propeganda and misinformation at the hands of your policies to "protect" them. Your guidelines are not holy writ, and are unfit for this task.
Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware?
by mwcampbell on Monday October 26, 2020 @09:57AM
(#24896194)
If you had responded with rebuttals to the misinformation in the article and/or comment thread, plus a link to your previous article, without the snarky tone, your comment thread probably wouldn't be languishing at the bottom of the page. It's not enough to be right; tone matters too.
Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware?
by sergeykish on Monday October 26, 2020 @11:04AM
(#24896917)
I completely agree there is a lot of misinformation but you can't fight it with flame, only with facts.
* If phoronix made test maybe we need to make another one.
* If people say it is hard to make application we can show that GTK+ works on both X.Org and Wayland.
* If they say it is impossible to make screenshot show grim.
* If they say X11 networking show bitmaps traveling by network.
* If they say no Wayland improvements show video of tearing.
My arguments buried here too.
I definitely don't want to penalize your counterarguments, but if you can't or won't decouple them from guidelines-breakage, what choice do we have? We do just the same with users and threads that are arguing the opposite.
There are two very different issues here: (1) Wayland; (2) protecting the commons. Important as the first one is, the second has to take precedence because it affects every topic, every thread, and the survival of the community.