Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware?
by ddevault on Sunday October 25, 2020 @04:59PM
(#24889838)
The commons are full of propeganda and misinformation at the hands of your policies to "protect" them. Your guidelines are not holy writ, and are unfit for this task.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware?
by mwcampbell on Monday October 26, 2020 @09:57AM
(#24896194)
If you had responded with rebuttals to the misinformation in the article and/or comment thread, plus a link to your previous article, without the snarky tone, your comment thread probably wouldn't be languishing at the bottom of the page. It's not enough to be right; tone matters too.
Re:The X.Org Server Is Abandonware?
by sergeykish on Monday October 26, 2020 @11:04AM
(#24896917)
I completely agree there is a lot of misinformation but you can't fight it with flame, only with facts.
* If phoronix made test maybe we need to make another one.
* If people say it is hard to make application we can show that GTK+ works on both X.Org and Wayland.
* If they say it is impossible to make screenshot show grim.
* If they say X11 networking show bitmaps traveling by network.
* If they say no Wayland improvements show video of tearing.
My arguments buried here too.