News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Teageneration (or: why I don’t trust transporters) (2016) by necubi on Saturday October 17, 2020 @03:50PM (#24812646)
This is like a physical version of "I Am Sitting In A Room" [0], a classic work of experimental music. In that piece, Alvin Lucier speaks the words "I am sitting in a room different from the the one you are in now..." into a recorder, which is then played back into another recorder, on and on until it becomes unintelligible.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAxHlLK3Oyk

Re:Teageneration (or: why I don’t trust transporters) (2016) by fluffycritter on Saturday October 17, 2020 @09:22PM (#24814855)
Hi, artist here. I also did an interactive installation work directly inspired by I Am Sitting In A Room. :) It's only had a single (prototype) showing though. https://beesbuzz.biz/art/1512-whatwesaidwillbe
Re:Teageneration (or: why I don’t trust transporters) (2016) by est31 on Saturday October 17, 2020 @03:36PM (#24812528)
Re:Teageneration (or: why I don’t trust transporters) (2016) by the_pwner224 on Saturday October 17, 2020 @05:38PM (#24813599)
Re:Teageneration (or: why I don’t trust transporters) (2016) by teddyh on Saturday October 17, 2020 @03:49PM (#24812643)
Whatever scanner they used, it seems terrible for the purpose of scanning teapots.
Re:Teageneration (or: why I don’t trust transporters) (2016) by fluffycritter on Saturday October 17, 2020 @09:23PM (#24814859)
I used a structure.io sensor (referenced in the text of the post). https://structure.io/
Re:Teageneration (or: why I don’t trust transporters) (2016) by amelius on Saturday October 17, 2020 @05:57PM (#24813734)
I suppose a 3d-printed object could carry a (steganographic?) copy of its own specification, so you could replicate it endlessly without degeneration.
Re:Teageneration (or: why I don’t trust transporters) (2016) by CrazyStat on Saturday October 17, 2020 @07:05PM (#24814139)
Only if the specification is concise enough to fit in/on the object. If you're 3d printing a sphere or another shape that can easily be parameterized, great; if you're 3d printing a model of a brain I expect you'll have a hard time.
Re:Teageneration (or: why I don’t trust transporters) (2016) by dTal on Sunday October 18, 2020 @05:05PM (#24821125)
That doesn't sound entirely trivial? Like a physical quine.
Re:Teageneration (or: why I don’t trust transporters) (2016) by amelius on Sunday October 18, 2020 @05:50PM (#24821395)
Let S be the original specification.

Let F(S) be the specification with steganography applied. The steganography ensures that there is a Finv that can be induced from F(S) and such that Finv(F(S)) = S.

You print F(S).

The receiver scans the object F(S) and computes S.

From there you can repeat the process.

Re:Teageneration (or: why I don’t trust transporters) (2016) by Smaug123 on Saturday October 17, 2020 @04:28PM (#24813021)
It's a bit different scanning a teapot to scanning a human - it may be the case that the built-in ability for humans to self-repair could carry the day, even granting that generation loss is an unavoidable thing for teleporters. Interesting artwork though!