Re:Elite do-gooders 'fixing' the world are part of the probl...
by DontGiveTwoFlux on Tuesday August 11, 2020 @03:42PM
(#24125051)
This comment hits on one particular issue of ulterior motives in the actions of a non-profit.
But more generally, there is a whitewashing going on. Look at the Sackler family, which for decades got to put their names on museums, hospitals, etc. they get to go around spreading a story about how good they are while rotting out communities with their dirty opioid pushing. They got called out, sure, but how many other Sacklers are out there with their reputations unburnished?
Re:Elite do-gooders 'fixing' the world are part of the probl...
by blaser-waffle on Wednesday August 12, 2020 @11:22AM
(#24132947)
I'd imagine this would be most billionaires.
"Money talks, wealth whispers."
Re:Elite do-gooders 'fixing' the world are part of the probl...
by growlist on Tuesday August 11, 2020 @03:41PM
(#24125039)
> There are many non-profits funded by elites that operate to advance societal good superficially while pushing ulterior political motives.
George Soros and his 'Open Society Foundation' is another example.
For a concrete example, a tremendous amount of money has recently flowed into sex education advocacy, some of which doesn’t have donor names attached to it.
Organizations that aim to provide resources around things like consent and healthy sexual behavior find that courting this new money involves adopting an abstinence-only approach as a mandate. As a result, it’s hard to know if the organization you’re donating to is actually doing the advocacy work they used to advertise, and they’re not always inclined to be transparent around who calls the shots from a donor perspective.
We like to think that political money lives only in super PACs and lobbying efforts, but this isn’t the case, and in some ways this makes the non-profit situation even more insidious. To be clear, I’m not denigrating all non-profit work, there are just some major transparency issues that need to be addressed.