It did mean that my mornings were totally free and I could get a lot done - so it swings both ways, but outsource everything to Europe isn't the panacea some people assume it to be.
The biggest time gap team I've worked on was east coast US and China.
Great. 12 hour gap.
US team changed to being in the office, or at least online, at 6am. China team started at 11am in China. Roughly a 3 hour handover time.
It worked.
But for some was a toil. When interviewing and taking pains to point this out, the usual response being "Ok, no problem" but then a few months later seeing someone looking visibility drained wasn't good. Helped them find an alternative role. And some loved it, especially the reduced traffic and sense of community.
During this handover period everyone had a webcam on their OC, a fair amount of travel between sites which all participants were excited for on and three US-China marriages happened over the years.
Great for some. Terrible for others.
I’m sure there are people who’d work 13-22 but I’d bet a substantial sum employee churn would be consistently higher.
Wife used to work for a company with an office in Yorkshire where working hours finished at 2pm (7-2 no lunch). Horses for courses.
HN does seem to bias towards morning based extrovert urbanites in its group think. It’s nowhere near as universal as you might think.
Even with great communication and good management, having little overlap during the day for realtime conversations made it hard for me to feel like we were a well-oiled machine, especially with so much of the product changing on a daily basis. It’s very much a complex decision to make, in my opinion.