Is there any real reason why Tesla should be worth more than the rest of the US auto industry combined? Can Uber ever actually turn enough profit to justify their valuation? At what point does Amazon stop growing and their PE ratio start mattering?
Right now investors seem to believe that these companies have a very bright future ahead of them. Some of these companies have had “a very bright future” for over 20 years now. Some of these companies have very bright futures even though they’re only supported by investors and have never made any money of their own. Uber, for example, lost $8.5b in 2019 and are surely going to lose a ton this year too.
In the long run, how many SV unicorns and traditional companies pretending they’re tech companies will actually prove their valuation was right? A bear would say very few.
I think this is like asking "Should Amazon be worth more than all e-tailers combined?" circa 2009. Both of their businesses are growing in tangential directions to their core business. In just about 5 years, AWS turned from some "nice supplemental income" to becoming the company's new core product.
The Tesla bulls are betting that Tesla's energy collection and storage products will grow to eclipse their car business and take advantage of the economy of scale of the GigaFactories. The bears are only looking at Tesla as a niche car company.
DHH had a widely shared post where he said FB wasn't worth $33B+ and it could never be. He was clearly wrong (off by an order of magnitude). Eventually there will be some overvalued companies (WeWork before the valuation plummeted might be a good example). But given how many bear predictions have turned out to be really wrong, it's good to be skeptical of similar arguments going forward (they won't always been wrong, but some have been spectacularly wrong).
Fab could have been successful as a not-so-large company, but it wanted to be Amazon.
For every pundit-bashed unicorn, there are tens of thousands of times the pundits got it right.
That's been the dynamic with Tesla since the company was started.
> At that point Tesla may become no more than Dachia or Kia.
The future is already here, and it requires these old car companies (Ford, GM, etc) to not only become electric car companies, but also become computer hardware and software companies. Many many manufacturers will fold in the coming years or be absorbed by larger conglomerates because they simply won't be able to compete on these vectors.
The advantages/efficiencies these old car companies have spent decades building are being rendered irrelevant. And that's the real problem for them. The risk isn't that they can't compete, the risk is that whatever they put out is irrelevant. Think iPhone v. Blackberry.
It's not just about making a new type of car. It's about building a new kind of company entirely.
The worst case scenario is Tesla gets acquired for a godly sum of money - not that it goes under or becomes the next Kia. Tesla's battery production capacity very well makes the company one of national strategic interest.