Re:Stack Overflow gets series E funding for $85M
by mikestew on Tuesday July 28, 2020 @01:06PM
(#23978028)
That said, I'm struggling to understand how/why a they could possibly need to raise now a total of $153MM.
Gotta make the work of those digital sharecroppers pay off somehow: https://blog.codinghorror.com/are-you-a-digital-sharecropper...
No, the fact that the blog post was written by a SO founder is not lost on me.
Re:Stack Overflow gets series E funding for $85M
by tghw on Tuesday July 28, 2020 @02:29PM
(#23979096)
> This is a topic that I've spent a great deal of time thinking about, because we happen to run a site chock full of user generated questions and answers. The last thing I want to do is exploit Stack Overflow users for corporate gain, even accidentally. That's horrible.
Yikes. Right on the nose...
Re:Stack Overflow gets series E funding for $85M
by schwinn140 on Tuesday July 28, 2020 @02:47PM
(#23979285)
Yikes is right. Seems like they said the quiet part out loud.
Re:Stack Overflow gets series E funding for $85M
by JeremyBanks on Tuesday July 28, 2020 @03:42PM
(#23979837)
Jeff Atwood had principles, which is why the current morally bankrupt leadership wants to erase him. Stack would have been in a much better place if he’d been left in charge.
Re:Stack Overflow gets series E funding for $85M
by scarface74 on Tuesday July 28, 2020 @09:28PM
(#23982594)
Why is it congratulatory when a company needs another round of funding? Shouldn’t they be congratulated once they have profitable business model that doesn’t require outside funding?
All the content is community generated so there's no costs there.
The core Exchange product is extremely templatized and I would assume be quite scale-able to spin-up as they need additional ones.
I don't believe they have much in the form of paid outbound marketing initiatives.
I'm assuming that I'm completely missing something here. Educate me. ;)