https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polynesian_navigation
Maybe discovering far away lands was to them meaningful for exactly the same reasons that it was later for the European explorers who rediscovered their islands...
I couldn't agree more.
> Tupaia was born at Ha'amanino Harbour on Ra'iatea around 1725 and became a leading ariori priest for the Taputapuatea marae. Tupaia was trained in the fare-'ai-ra'a-'upu, or schools of learning, about the origin of the cosmos, genealogies, the calendar, proverbs and histories. He was also taught how to be a star navigator. His memorized knowledge included island lists, including their size, reef and harbor locations, whether they were inhabited, and if so, the name of the chief and any food produced there. More importantly, his memory would include the bearing of each island, the time to get there, and the succession of stars and islands to follow to get there. These islands included the Society Islands, the Austral Islands, the Cook Islands, plus Samoa, Tonga, Tokelau and Fiji.[1]
> when asked for details of the region Tupaia drew a chart showing all 130 islands within a 2,000 miles (3,200 km) radius and was able to name 74 of them
> The chart he drew for James Cook in August 1769 shows interconnected voyaging routes ranging from Rotuma west of Samoa, via Samoa and Tonga, the southern Cook Islands and the Austral Group, Mangareva and Pitcairn all the way to Rapa Nui. A second major composite route leads from Tahiti through the Tuamotu Group to the Marquesas Group and on to Oahu in Hawai'i. Tupaia invented a cartographic system for Cook and his men which located a northern bearing from any island he drew in the centre of his Chart (marked by the word 'avatea', this is '[the sun at] noon'). This allowed him to translate his own wayfinding knowledge for island-to-island voyages into the logic and terms of Cook's compass. The Admiralty manuscript of James Cook's journal indicates that Tupaia told Cook that he himself (or his ancestors) travelled to most islands drawn on the Chart excepting only Rotuma (north of Fiji) and Oahu in Hawai'i. [7]
It's easy to criticize the successful, but each of us is the result of a global legacy of competitive murder, no matter your race.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatham_Islands
This history also illustrates that peacefulness is also within the capacity of any people.
Some of those ideas fuel the passion to head out to Mars which has a similar cost/benefit. If we establish there I’m sure a new horizon will appear with some of us driving ourselves towards it.
In a pre agrarian, pre sheparding society, all you could do is find things to eat since you couldn't create them yourself. Pastoralism made it possible to store the energy from natural resources in the form of animal meat, but that still required grazing your flock and moving to available grass and water. Even one person camping can strip an area of natural resources surprisingly quickly. It wasn't until the development of agriculture that people were able to stay in place long term.
So life was cheap, people had little to lose, and the average person had to take risks we can barely imagine.
Plus, it doesn't take everyone doing it. It only takes a couple families in a couple boats, each generation, to hop across the whole ocean.
1. Boredom. Yeah, plenty of food, whatever; what should I do all day, shake coconut trees? BORING!
2. Prestige. Growing a family is not cool. Do you know what’s cool? Finding a new island and coming back a chief.
3. Conflict. Damn, the chief is a pain in the ass, males me shake coconut trees all day. I’m going to get my own island, with hookers and blackjack.
4. Curiosity. I want to see what’s beyond. Maybe I’ll meet the gods, that would be great!
5. Swagger. I am the best sailor in the tribe, the sea is my bitch, and I’ll show you.
6. Duty and tradition. Our culture is defined by expansion, it is my duty to do what our ancestors did.
7. Redemption. I screwed up, my life in this tribe is over, I have nothing to lose trying to start again beyond the sea.
I have not read any literature about the motivations, but they may have gone a long distance and turned back if they found no land. They were probably explorers with the same human motivations as European explorers, the desire to find out what is out there whatever the cost, and we remember the ones that succeeded, such as Kupe
It's very possible that some of the longest distance voyages such as the ones that found the corners of the Polynesian triangle in NZ, Easter Island, and Hawaii were triggered by conflicts with the losing group opting to go on an exploratory voyage.
Read up on Bartle Types (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bartle_taxonomy_of_player_type...). I have to assume that the idea of the Explorer type is not limited just to games.
Or maybe warring peoples invaded from the west, so they picked up and headed east looking for a new home.
Or maybe there was overpopulation on their island so they looked for a new place to spread out.
Or maybe they were just like us and some young guys were thrill seekers/adrenaline junkies/adventurers/etc. and they just wanted to head out to see what they could find.