News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:De-escalating social media conflict by mdpopescu on Sunday July 05, 2020 @04:44AM (#23737397)
Journalists aren't the elite. They're the PR people working for the elite.
Re:De-escalating social media conflict by nl on Sunday July 05, 2020 @10:24AM (#23738880)
I think the whole "elites" terminology is silly.

As a very broad generalisation it seems to mean "people who are richer or have a bigger voice than me who I disagree with.

Re:De-escalating social media conflict by rapnie on Sunday July 05, 2020 @06:04AM (#23737656)
These generalizations and plattitudes are off the mark and dangerous. Sure, there are those working as PR for the elite, or they are honest journalists that work for MSM that is in the hands of the elites. Most journalists, especially investigative journalists want to do their job as well as they can, in an environment that is increasingly hostile to good journalism. We need these people to help keep our democracy intact.
Re:De-escalating social media conflict by tonyedgecombe on Sunday July 05, 2020 @06:07AM (#23737665)
Using elite as a term of derision is rather silly anyway. Who else would you want running the country than the most skilled and accomplished?
Re:De-escalating social media conflict by sukilot on Sunday July 05, 2020 @08:20AM (#23738133)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myth_of_meritocracy

I want a country where the median person is educated and grounded enough to make good choices about their community.

Re:De-escalating social media conflict by Siira on Wednesday July 08, 2020 @03:46PM (#23773529)
This might not be possible. (“Myth of egalitarianism”)
Re:De-escalating social media conflict by hnaccy on Sunday July 05, 2020 @06:36AM (#23737760)
People who have my interests in mind.
Re:De-escalating social media conflict by tonyedgecombe on Sunday July 05, 2020 @07:59AM (#23738033)
I think you'll be waiting a long time for that. The most I hope for is that politicians interests might align with mine.