hnaccy
What is his criticism? If you agree with silent majority who seem to think it's not dangerous why agree with Altman who rants regulation.
Makes it simple to select all tabs and copy paste as url or url + title
It's also snappy for filtering and jumping to tabs especially when using the hotkey, I've used it for years with regularly over 5k tabs.
It sounds like anytime I open an image in Preview it sends hashes to apple?
If the holders of capital who are best positioned to reap nearly all the benefits of automation aren't willing work towards some more equitable result why would I want to help automation at all. I'd rather work against it.
"just ignore the rising inequality and complete collapse in value of human labour we can work out the details later once I hold all the cards" is not a compelling story.
We're running headlong into a world where AI makes significant portion of human labor worthless.
If you're not valuable to the economic system you won't be treated well.
>It reminds me of NIMBYism. We’ve been automating entire professions for over a century now… but not MY profession…
Yes... it's self interest look at doctors or unions or guilds.
SBF is the son of two Stanford law professors, graduated from MIT, and worked four years at Jane Street.
It seems like the limit of credulity to think he was an unwitting dufus that just accidentally ran one of the biggest ponzis in history.
nobody is giving him money these days
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33457488
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33457933
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33459343
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33458943
A giant corporation openly steals code from millions of devs and uses to try and automate us and programmers cheer it on.
A billionaire with known poor labor practices buys Twitter and twitter devs make no attempt to organize as lab instead they just write toothless statements.
If microsoft wants a code AI they're free to create their own training data set instead laundering copyright violation of anything that's touched github. It being "hard" isn't an excuse.
Maybe I'm an outlier but of my hundreds of follows ~1% have checkmark. The bulk of my followers are artists, photographers, niche bloggers, subculture news aggregators which are all creating content.
The verified checkmark is basically a non-entity to my time on twitter, maybe it's different if you mainly follow more mainstream western pop culture and political/news media.
discord, telegram?
I recommend only mac or chrome book for older people.
in same vein as all those articles comparing time to process data on single laptop vs hadoop cluster or whatever
NLAWs are even cheaper and easier to use but don't know their estimated kill rate.
this just seems like a matter of taste
Isn't it the opposite? It may be too early to tell but NATO is reinvigorated, Europe is once again turned back towards the Atlantic faction, Russia's economy is faltering, Ukraine is out performing what anyone expected militarily and Russia's army looks shambolic.
I have seen that video linked often in past month and it seems like Mearsheimer's biggest miss was how weak Russia truly is and how irrational Putin may act. If we expect Russia to fiercely defend its interest in Ukraine as IR realists then shouldn't we also expect the US to use Ukraine to twist the knife in the current Russian state?
Where? I'd like to show it to people.
He says you should claim the right to suppress the intolerant and that preaching intolerance is outside the law.
And forcing every woman to have two children isn't?
Wut? This isn't clear at all. Lots of theft like this or mass retail theft are done by semi-organized crime rings.
No there will always be men willing to tread the line; some will fail and other will succeed. Food for thought from Zizek:
>A tension between rights and prohibitions determines heterosexual seduction in our politically correct times. Or, to put it differently, there is no seduction which cannot at some point be construed as intrusion or harassment because there will always be a point when one has to expose oneself and ‘make a pass’. But, of course, seduction doesn’t involve incorrect harassment throughout. When you make a pass, you expose yourself to the Other (the potential partner), and her reaction will determine whether what you just did was harassment or a successful act of seduction. There is no way to tell in advance what her response will be (which is why assertive women often despise ‘weak’ men, who fear to take the necessary risk). This holds even more in our pc times: the pc prohibitions are rules which, in one way or another, are to be violated in the seduction process. Isn’t the seducer’s art to accomplish the violation in such a way that, afterwards, by its acceptance, any suggestion of harassment has disappeared?
I don't find it surprising that thieves face more gruesome punishments like hanging, cutting off hands, etc in places especially when there may be little recourse for the victims of theft and the theft represents a significant impact on their life.
I think reasonable argument against such things is that it is too easy for people to mistakenly hurt a non-thief on accident. That's more convincing to me than simply saying property < life at all times. If I was poor and needed my vehicle to get to work everyday and you're stealing it then yes I would be willing to shoot you to stop you.
I guess reality does have a well known liberal bias :)