Re:ARM Mac: Why I'm Worried About Virtualization
by chx on Thursday June 25, 2020 @02:49PM
(#23644101)
> Most devs only want some kind of CLI and POSIX like capabilities.
which is why WSL is so great...
Re:ARM Mac: Why I'm Worried About Virtualization
by pjmlp on Friday June 26, 2020 @01:34AM
(#23649009)
Indeed, and WSL instead of a pure POSIX, because that allows to tap into the ecosystem that thinks Linux === UNIX, without having to recompile anything.
An approach already taken by other UNIX clones with their Linux compatibility syscalls layer.
Re:ARM Mac: Why I'm Worried About Virtualization
by anthk on Thursday June 25, 2020 @02:42PM
(#23644026)
You forgot X11 and Motif. Without that Windows would be useless back in the day.
Re:ARM Mac: Why I'm Worried About Virtualization
by pjmlp on Thursday June 25, 2020 @05:38PM
(#23646034)
Not really, because there were plenty of Win32 X Servers.
Back in the day I was using Hummingbird.
Re:ARM Mac: Why I'm Worried About Virtualization
by anthk on Friday June 26, 2020 @12:03AM
(#23648593)
You forgot about porting and compiling software which depended on X11 and Motif. Linux won because of that.
Re:ARM Mac: Why I'm Worried About Virtualization
by pjmlp on Friday June 26, 2020 @01:31AM
(#23648993)
What for? That is what having something like Hummingbird took care of.
I used to admin UNIX and develop for it from Windows NT/2000 workstations.
Also the FOSS version of Motif only appeared when Motif wasn't that much relevant and most enterprise shops were migrating to CORBA and Web as integration points.
Most devs only want some kind of CLI and POSIX like capabilities.