Re:Zoom closes account of U.S.-based Chinese activist after ...
by robocat on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @04:28PM
(#23481696)
I mostly agree with what you are trying to say, but being snarky is against the hn guidelines. Edit: “against” is too strong a word - it isn’t a hard rule but I often see the hn community react negatively to sarcasm and snarkiness even though the content may be worthwhile.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Zoom closes account of U.S.-based Chinese activist after ...
by dang on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @05:06PM
(#23482110)
It is a hard rule! https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
Re:Zoom closes account of U.S.-based Chinese activist after ...
by robocat on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @06:02PM
(#23482662)
I thought the the word “guidelines” usually implied something more flexible. Thank you for the clarification (I certainly appreciate the limited snarkyness and toxic sarcasm within the hn community).
Re:Zoom closes account of U.S.-based Chinese activist after ...
by pvg on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @07:26PM
(#23483379)
"I got your hard rule right here" would have been a perfectly fine reply, I think, so your initial impression is probably not that far off the mark in practice.
Re:Zoom closes account of U.S.-based Chinese activist after ...
by Novukus on Wednesday June 10, 2020 @04:39PM
(#23481811)
After seeing plenty of discussions on HN where people expressed how they'd rather keep using Zoom despite 1) clear security issues and 2) the development teams living in China, I didn't feel there was any other way to express the issue (and the discrepancy in values). There seems to be a blindness to geopolitical realities in the tech world, and this occurrence is the perfect example.