News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The “Majority Illusion” in Social Networks (2016) by systemvoltage on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @12:13AM (#23463573)
Life 20 years ago was kinda nice. Computers were cool. Sunday news is what you need to read to get global coverage. No social media or friends showing off their best and hiding the worse, neighbors and LAN parties, 9/11 happened and the country got together, I don't know... we didn't have insane Javascript frameworks. Things were much better. Ecommerce wasn't that big, so I actually went to the stores to buy stuff. Malls were cool.

I am pretty sure I am wrong.

Re:The “Majority Illusion” in Social Networks (2016) by luckylion on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @04:58AM (#23464971)
> 9/11 happened and the country got together, I don't know... we didn't have insane Javascript frameworks.

You really just need a common enemy, some far away country that you can focus your energy on, that you can bomb etc. It will bring the country together ... and give you more advanced javascript frameworks.

Re:The “Majority Illusion” in Social Networks (2016) by darepublic on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @07:30AM (#23465630)
I'm surprised you lump in 9/11 with the good times.. instead of starting their decline.

There were no insane JavaScript frameworks but some really nifty flash apps. The quality of flash games was improving everyday. The TAS community was in its golden era...

Re:The “Majority Illusion” in Social Networks (2016) by baddox on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @12:19AM (#23463600)
Perhaps you weren’t a member of any groups affected by the issues that have been protested recently and throughout recent history.
Re:The “Majority Illusion” in Social Networks (2016) by lelanthran on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @04:49AM (#23464932)
> Perhaps you weren’t a member of any groups affected by the issues that have been protested recently and throughout recent history.

I am, and I still think that the protesters are making a mountain out of a molehill.

Their response to police brutality is disproportionate. They are destroying innocent bystanders lives and livelihoods; the celebrities who are egging them on are doing so because their neighbourhoods, livelihoods and lives are not getting burned down (see https://www.rt.com/sport/490393-burn-that-shit-down-tweet-nb...).

Th only way to stop the protests is to bus protesters into those areas inhabited by these celebrity morons.

The people who are arguing against the police using teargas on rioters will sing a different tune when the mob is coming down their street, burning everything in their path. I guarantee that they will call for an armed response to someone attempting to burn their house down.

Re:The “Majority Illusion” in Social Networks (2016) by Majromax on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @09:06AM (#23466313)
> They are destroying innocent bystanders lives and livelihoods; the celebrities who are egging them on are doing so because their neighbourhoods, livelihoods and lives are not getting burned down (see https://www.rt.com[...])

With due respect, I fear this may be precisely an example of the "majority illusion" described in the article.

You're not seeing a representative sample of "their responses" or "celebrities" -- you're seeing a sample selected by the media specifically for the quality of being newsworthy. (Or entertaining, or engaging, or aligning with the outlet's political views)

If we're to learn anything from this PLOS article, it's that we should not be overly confident in our views about what "everyone else" is doing.

Re:The “Majority Illusion” in Social Networks (2016) by lelanthran on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @09:41AM (#23466558)
> You're not seeing a representative sample of "their responses" or "celebrities" -- you're seeing a sample selected by the media specifically for the quality of being newsworthy. (Or entertaining, or engaging, or aligning with the outlet's political views)

You are quite correct, but that just means that the mob is getting positive reinforcement for their actions from a vocal minority.

After all, I am seeing what the mob is seeing, and it looks like overwhelming support for the disproportionate response.

Re:The “Majority Illusion” in Social Networks (2016) by raxxorrax on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @05:39AM (#23465136)
I think there is a difference if the police kills someone because it is state violence everyone in society is responsible for. That is a huge difference in these events. I also think there was a powder keg that got released.

That said, I fully agree on the proclamations of many celebrities and I don't think anyone sees discrimination through an objective lens. I would certainly not kneel to any demands of protesters. Honestly, I think a majority of them would benefit from a stern talk by their parents. But that doesn't apply to everyone.

Re:The “Majority Illusion” in Social Networks (2016) by baddox on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @12:29PM (#23468051)
I have not seen any video or even claims of police using tear gas to cause looters to stop looting. It has probably happened a few times, but it looks abundantly clear to me that tear gas is overwhelmingly used on large groups of organized and peaceful protesters, and the looting is happening elsewhere. I’ve seen so much footage of organized protests marching down streets, and it does not appear that they are burning anything in their path.
Re:The “Majority Illusion” in Social Networks (2016) by systemvoltage on Tuesday June 09, 2020 @12:31AM (#23463665)
Definitely, I feel like my life just has been in this cacoon lacking externalities and realities of struggles many others experience. I express my empathy towards them and protest for a just, fair and accountable system of law enforcement.