I am, and I still think that the protesters are making a mountain out of a molehill.
Their response to police brutality is disproportionate. They are destroying innocent bystanders lives and livelihoods; the celebrities who are egging them on are doing so because their neighbourhoods, livelihoods and lives are not getting burned down (see https://www.rt.com/sport/490393-burn-that-shit-down-tweet-nb...).
Th only way to stop the protests is to bus protesters into those areas inhabited by these celebrity morons.
The people who are arguing against the police using teargas on rioters will sing a different tune when the mob is coming down their street, burning everything in their path. I guarantee that they will call for an armed response to someone attempting to burn their house down.
With due respect, I fear this may be precisely an example of the "majority illusion" described in the article.
You're not seeing a representative sample of "their responses" or "celebrities" -- you're seeing a sample selected by the media specifically for the quality of being newsworthy. (Or entertaining, or engaging, or aligning with the outlet's political views)
If we're to learn anything from this PLOS article, it's that we should not be overly confident in our views about what "everyone else" is doing.
You are quite correct, but that just means that the mob is getting positive reinforcement for their actions from a vocal minority.
After all, I am seeing what the mob is seeing, and it looks like overwhelming support for the disproportionate response.
That said, I fully agree on the proclamations of many celebrities and I don't think anyone sees discrimination through an objective lens. I would certainly not kneel to any demands of protesters. Honestly, I think a majority of them would benefit from a stern talk by their parents. But that doesn't apply to everyone.