News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SpaceX successfully launches two humans into orbit by gruturo on Sunday May 31, 2020 @07:40AM (#23368911)
High frequency traders do NOT want to be limited by the speed of light in a fiber - due to its refractive index (1.5 for ZBLAN according to Wikipedia) this is only 66% of the speed of a radio signal. Over 10km this amounts to an 11 microseconds difference - already significant for HFT.

This is why they have been leveling hills to carve a (mostly, with minimal amount of repeater towers) line of sight path between NYC and Chicago, gaining 3ms (1), or set up a line of sight laser link between NYSE and NASDAQ to eke out a handful of microseconds (2), or set up multiple links across the English channel to reduce latency between London, Amsterdam and Frankfurt (3).

1. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/14/opinion/krugman-three-exp...

2. https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/176551-new-laser-network...

3. https://sniperinmahwah.wordpress.com/2016/01/26/hft-in-the-b...

Re:SpaceX successfully launches two humans into orbit by DennisP on Sunday May 31, 2020 @09:01AM (#23369301)
I've seen speculation that low latency may be a big part of the business plan for Starlink.
Re:SpaceX successfully launches two humans into orbit by spullara on Sunday May 31, 2020 @09:10PM (#23374656)
It should be faster for long distances than cables for sure. Also less routing.
Re:SpaceX successfully launches two humans into orbit by LargoLasskhyfv on Sunday May 31, 2020 @09:46AM (#23369558)
One could use hollow core fiber, which has much higher limits. Up to 99% of light in a vacuum IIRC.
Re:SpaceX successfully launches two humans into orbit by tornato7 on Sunday May 31, 2020 @02:06PM (#23371332)
A wave guide?
Re:SpaceX successfully launches two humans into orbit by LargoLasskhyfv on Sunday May 31, 2020 @03:03PM (#23371762)