News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by np_tedious on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @10:19PM (#23174498)
Do they have to be viable candidates? I don't mind being in a permanent state of casual campaigning
Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by closeparen on Thursday May 14, 2020 @01:11AM (#23175558)
>An individual running for a seat in the House or Senate or for the office of U.S. President becomes a candidate when he or she raises or spends more than $5,000 in contributions or expenditures.

One generally needs a certain number of petition signatures to appear on a ballot, but apparently not needed just to legally be a candidate.

https://www.fec.gov/help-candidates-and-committees/registeri...

Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by Descartes1 on Thursday May 14, 2020 @02:04AM (#23175931)
Do you have to actually spend that $5000? Or can you just have it "raised"?
Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by aperrien on Thursday May 14, 2020 @03:10AM (#23176372)
Create a nonprofit to accept the "raised" contribution, and then swap it with another candidate in the pool for "consulting fees"...
Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by boredgamer2 on Thursday May 14, 2020 @08:52AM (#23178837)
> Create a nonprofit

I like the enthusiasm, but this would get you slapped by the IRS (eventually). Any other ideas?

Maybe if we just pay each other in a ring through a legal escrow? Everyone puts in $5,001, the escrow pays everyone back $5000.

Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by godelski on Thursday May 14, 2020 @03:11AM (#23176386)
So we start a party where we all sign to get each other on the ballot and donate to a pool that allocates $5k to each of us? Can this $5k just be moved around per candidate which counts as spending?
Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by voldacar on Thursday May 14, 2020 @03:37AM (#23176578)
This would become a problem if someone just joined the party with the intent of cashing out the 5k$ and leaving. Maybe you could fix this somehow with smart contracts? idk
Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by boredgamer2 on Thursday May 14, 2020 @08:53AM (#23178852)
Legal escrow! No smart contracts needed
Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by celticninja on Thursday May 14, 2020 @04:08AM (#23176790)
if you cash out the $5k you lose candidate status.
Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by Wowfunhappy on Thursday May 14, 2020 @07:23AM (#23178151)
“Fine by me, I’m $5k richer now!”
Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by dkersten on Thursday May 14, 2020 @07:35AM (#23178246)
Assign it but don’t physically give it to them?
Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by giancarlostoro on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @10:33PM (#23174595)
We can even make a political party out of it where everyone in the party is a candidate.
Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by ObsoleteNerd on Thursday May 14, 2020 @02:19AM (#23176040)
The Privacy Party is born.
Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by app4soft on Thursday May 14, 2020 @04:04AM (#23176757)
Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by giancarlostoro on Thursday May 14, 2020 @08:09PM (#23187351)
To be fair the Pirate Party is very pro privacy for seemingly obvious reasons.
Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by analognoise on Wednesday May 13, 2020 @10:46PM (#23174708)
This has a very Slack vibe to it that I can dig.
Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by analognoise on Thursday May 14, 2020 @11:16AM (#23180540)
No love for the Church of the SubGenious?
Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by giancarlostoro on Thursday May 14, 2020 @08:10PM (#23187362)
I gave you an upvote in the previous comment because I knew what you were talking about mainly due to Slackware's reference to Church of SubGenious. I don't think many know what that is though.

For those curious:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_the_SubGenius

Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by yumraj on Thursday May 14, 2020 @12:23AM (#23175262)
That is indeed a great idea. Where and how do I sign up.

It would be a great act of civil disobedience.

Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by StillBored on Thursday May 14, 2020 @06:24AM (#23177745)
Oh, that is great!

I would like to add, just think of the chaos at the primaries if the act of declaring candidacy one also declares they are running for the R|D nomination. The voting machines can barely deal with 20 presidential candidates. Imagine what would happen if you had to thousands of people running for a congressional seat!

Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by chrisco255 on Thursday May 14, 2020 @03:24AM (#23176472)
I nominate np_tedious for President, along with the rest of Hacker News.
Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by DrScump on Thursday May 14, 2020 @05:03AM (#23177200)
I thought we were an autonomous collective.
Re:Senate narrowly rejects plan to require a warrant for Ame... by dredmorbius on Thursday May 14, 2020 @06:40AM (#23177857)
Some of us are more autonomous than others.

Some are more collective.