Re:Finding new physics will require a new particle collider
by dylan604 on Sunday May 10, 2020 @01:45PM
(#23134471)
So, what other types of physics is not well understood and requires funding to further research. We know F=ma, things in motion stay in motion, blah, and so on. We know a current flowing down a path will generate a magnetic field. We electrons moving to a lower energy path will release energy. We know light bends in a lens, and how to make that useful. Essentially, the funding for pure research and discovery is going to be more exciting than how to take a current understanding of physics into a way of making money. Plus, that kind of research should be undertaken by private investment.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Finding new physics will require a new particle collider
by semi-extrinsic on Sunday May 10, 2020 @02:10PM
(#23134668)
One very simple way to answer this question is that the American Physical Society publishes journals called Physical Review {A,B,C,D,E}. Of these, Phys Rev D is the one focused on high-energy physics.
If there was no other interesting physics requiring further research, how could those other fields be generating enough papers to fill 4 journals?
And this isn't even counting more recent journals like Phys. Rev. Fluids.
Re:Finding new physics will require a new particle collider
by godelski on Sunday May 10, 2020 @02:46PM
(#23134954)
Super conductors, semiconductors, cosmology, qm (including computing), and optics to name a few. There's still significant research to be done in all these fields, and more.
Re:Finding new physics will require a new particle collider
by agumonkey on Sunday May 10, 2020 @03:24PM
(#23135329)
> semiconductors
even after decades of massive use ?
Re:Finding new physics will require a new particle collider
by godelski on Sunday May 10, 2020 @04:00PM
(#23135635)
Oh yeah. In fact, that's exactly where there needs to be more research.
Re:Finding new physics will require a new particle collider
by gerdesj on Sunday May 10, 2020 @05:55PM
(#23136632)
Get superconductivity working at say 0 deg C and you will be able to pick your accolade and price. Get it working at 100 deg C and you will have won the world.
Re:Finding new physics will require a new particle collider
by analog31 on Sunday May 10, 2020 @07:47PM
(#23137386)
I'll take 77 K any day of the week, especially if you can run a magnet with it at that temperature.
Note for the wider audience: 77 K is liquid nitrogen, vastly easier to produce and handle than liquid helium.
Re:Finding new physics will require a new particle collider
by gerdesj on Monday May 11, 2020 @07:52PM
(#23148855)
Quite right. The day when you can engage Heston Blumenthal to do your super conductivity experiment, is the day you have won!
(HB is an experimental chef who uses quite a lot of liquid N. Liquid He is probably not indicated for food prep)
Re:Finding new physics will require a new particle collider
by fsflover on Sunday May 10, 2020 @03:15PM
(#23135260)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-electron_laser
These things allow to create warm-dense matter in a laboratory:
Re:Finding new physics will require a new particle collider
by analog31 on Sunday May 10, 2020 @07:46PM
(#23137379)
There's always new physics in the next digit of theory or experiment. It's not sexy, and doesn't fall into (subjective) notions of "fundamental." Discovery may be hard, but can't be ruled out.