Reviving a 16-year-old Mac App

Re:Reviving a 16-year-old Mac App by Frondo on Tuesday May 05, 2020 @11:54PM (#23087770)

Heh, I actually prefer the app store version wherever I can download it, because I like not having to think about updates; I let the software updater do it. Is this an uncommon attitude?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reviving a 16-year-old Mac App by realusername on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @12:19AM (#23087866)

Developers care a lot about updates, your average user does not. For them, an update means there's a chance the app isn't going to work like it used to be.

People went as far as disabling all windows updates manually.

Also as a second point, you can totally have a software updater without an app store.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reviving a 16-year-old Mac App by ulisesrmzroche on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @08:15AM (#23090091)

This isn’t true. And it has nothing to do with OSX.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Reviving a 16-year-old Mac App by tonyedgecombe on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @05:04AM (#23089122)

I used to but then I had one app where the developer switched to a rental model but didn't let existing customers continue with the old model.

I don't have any particular problems with the rental model but in this case I had bought it on the basis of it not being that.

[ Parent | on HN ]