I don't mean to imply that you shouldn't use Linux or that the Linux version shouldn't work—but if you're using an uncommon platform, that might be why you're having uncommon issues.
Getting the join by browser link apparently can be an issues but at least in the edu account I manage there is an admin setting to always provide the join with browser link.
If they don't want to do a good job supporting the OS I run then don't support it, or call the support a beta version and have an easy user flow to get to the web client or something.
Otherwise yea, I'm going to call a spade a spade and say it's bad software when it doesn't work as intended as an official release on an officially supported target.
A much, much more fair/reasonable comparison would’ve been the three computers running three different Operating Systems, of course.
I don’t mean to sound harsh, but I’m sorry, if you’re on •nix, if commercial software exists for it, count your lucky stars a build even exists - and also remember you are exponentially insignificant compared to all other platforms. You will not get the same standard of support and they probably can’t justify dedicating too many more resources to it if you have issues. You represent a drop or two of water in the dozen gallons of daily users.
I’m shocked there’s even a •nix client. Good on them for making an effort, even. (Not that I’d be caught dead with Zoom on my computer, it seems scarier than Google from a privacy perspective!)
Zoom making their software badly on Linux is 100% in line with the company. They aren't aiming for good design, they are aiming for the nontechnical user using out of the box windows or MacOS.
FWIW, the Linux version works fine for me, with a couple of niggles. The most annoying of which is that the software turns the headphone volume up to maximum at the start of every call.
No, it's not hard scientific data with a p-value. But IMO it's important to not simply write away all experience as anecdote not data without contextualizing the relevancy of the anecdata in question. I have seen way too many HN comments that look at usability and don't realize how specific their situation is that causes their issue. That and of course their complaints not being relevant/visible to the typical end user.
And yeah, it's quite funny, how noone proposting has a measured opinion, it's always: Zoom's by far the best... (and being in education, it seems like around 50% of my course participants are joining Zoom on mobile, because it won't work on their computer...)
As for alternatives: all are sh* in one way or another (try Jitsi with Chrome please, then it works great!, I know of a local LUG which outright bans non-Blink on their instance....). I use it now, because admininstration says it's fine (and discord is equally horrible from a privacy standpoint)
Yesterday our team gave a shot to Google Meet but it does not allow screen sharing on Firefox (seems IE6 errr Chrome only feature)
The other one I have for enterprise reasons is Vibe, and starting that beast up is a "five minute notice" affair.
I've had various really annoying issues (completely blank settings windows, sound devices not getting recognized or used properly, crashes). All of these I've experienced both historically and during the past month. Neither Ubuntu, Arch or NixOS, all on three different laptop models, have been free of show-stopping issues.
When a customer wants to use Zoom for a call, it's been about 50/50 that we can do the call without issues.
I just find it suspicious that all the top comments are "it just works" when my experience has been the complete opposite, in various environments.
So far Google Meet and Whereby (formerly Appear.in) have been the least hassle-free in my experience (probably due to being web-based). Looking forward to trying Jitsi when I have the time and inclination, it looks really promising.