Re:Would You Have Fallen for This Phone Scam?
by asdff on Wednesday April 29, 2020 @02:14AM
(#23015984)
I once had my car towed by the city, only I had no way to tell it was them because it's not like they tell you. I figured I'd call the tow yard before I filed a police report for a stolen vehicle. Completely automated system where you had to give them the social security number of whoever had the title to verify whether or not they had the car in the lot. At the time the car was in my dads name, so I had to give this automated system that I had no way of knowing was legit my dads social security number over the phone. They did have the car at least, but boy if a scammer had a spoofed phone number 1 digit off from the towyard's, they would be sitting on a lot of people's social security numbers right now.
Re:Would You Have Fallen for This Phone Scam?
by dave5104 on Tuesday April 28, 2020 @07:30PM
(#23013424)
Schwab Bank started using voice recognition "passwords" as well. Luckily, it requires you to log into their website after talking through voice password tutorial to activate the voice password--which I refused to do at the time. Good to know I made a decent choice.
Re:Would You Have Fallen for This Phone Scam?
by dave84 on Tuesday April 28, 2020 @07:43PM
(#23013532)
Reminds me of my favorite 'hacking' movie Sneakers: "Hi, my name is Werner Brandes. My voice is my passport. Verify Me."
Re:Would You Have Fallen for This Phone Scam?
by lotsofpulp on Tuesday April 28, 2020 @08:02PM
(#23013671)
Fidelity has you put in your online password via the number pad. Have fun if you use a secure 20 digit randomly generated password.
Re:Would You Have Fallen for This Phone Scam?
by mindslight on Tuesday April 28, 2020 @08:35PM
(#23013909)
Never mind the insanity of leaking a secret that would otherwise only travel over TLS. Banks wouldn't know actual security if it fell into their lap. They got spoiled by pretending SSNs were somehow private, and are still trying to use "identification" as a crutch rather than focusing on proper authorization - eg a hierarchy of auth levels with the master being a public key on a hardware token, ideally that you go into a branch to replace. The only thing a person can do is refuse their snake oil voiceprints etc wherever possible, and most importantly monitor your accounts religiously at least every 40 days.
Even worse, the snake oil is leaking to non-banks as well. For example, Amazon now seems to insist on doing an email challenge for every login. Very unfriendly UX. Eventually I'll get around to writing a procmail recipe that grabs the codes out of emails/texts, and spits them to a terminal ready to be pasted.
Re:Would You Have Fallen for This Phone Scam?
by Nursie on Wednesday April 29, 2020 @05:42AM
(#23017253)
Most banks in the UK have given out hardware 2fa devices for years. I have one for my company accounts that's activated with its own PIN that gives out logon and authorisation codes.
Is this not true in the US?
They are often now replaced by banking apps that offer a similar feature, as my consumer account with the same bank has done.
Re:Would You Have Fallen for This Phone Scam?
by lotsofpulp on Wednesday April 29, 2020 @05:59AM
(#23017378)
When it comes to banks, if it makes life easy for the customer, it’s probably not true in the US.
We still don’t have chip and PIN, and we most certainly don’t have TOTP 2FA.
Re:Would You Have Fallen for This Phone Scam?
by canjobear on Tuesday April 28, 2020 @11:11PM
(#23014883)
Voice recognition is far more advanced than voice generation.
Re:Would You Have Fallen for This Phone Scam?
by hoseja on Wednesday April 29, 2020 @03:48AM
(#23016536)
Not if it's GAN, no?
Re:Would You Have Fallen for This Phone Scam?
by awryoyster on Tuesday April 28, 2020 @10:09PM
(#23014514)
Government services in Australia have been implementing this technology as well. I hope it won't become mandatory ️
> Many banks including TD Bank on the East Coast of The US, and throughout Canada are now using voice recognition technology for their telephone banking.
> You can only imagine how easily that is spoofed as well.
That's absolutely hilarious... because the technology that allows a person's voice to be recognized is the exact same technology that allows it to be imitated.