News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I Spent $6M on Google Ads Last Year by LunaSea on Monday April 27, 2020 @12:53PM (#22997559)
If you still have the (anonymised) IP addresses I can tell you if the downloads was coming from bots or not.
Re:I Spent $6M on Google Ads Last Year by SXX on Monday April 27, 2020 @08:21PM (#23001905)
How will IPs help you? Nobody is running those bots using datacenter IPs.
Re:I Spent $6M on Google Ads Last Year by martindevans on Monday April 27, 2020 @01:07PM (#22997707)
How can you anonymise an IP address? Given that (as I understand it) an IP address is considered personally identifying information under GDPR.
Re:I Spent $6M on Google Ads Last Year by ruialmeida on Monday April 27, 2020 @01:25PM (#22997880)
Google Analytics can do this by setting the last octet of IPv4 addresses and the last 80 bits of IPv6 addresses to zeros.

Reference: https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/2763052?hl=en

Re:I Spent $6M on Google Ads Last Year by nabeards on Monday April 27, 2020 @01:52PM (#22998138)
I thought this wasn’t true unless you had other data to aid in linking the IP address directly to the person (in http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&doc...).

So unless you have additional identifiers, an IP address by itself isn’t enough.

Re:I Spent $6M on Google Ads Last Year by dkersten on Monday April 27, 2020 @05:17PM (#23000147)
That’s not how I interpreted the ruling from the case you linked, although I’m not a lawyer:

Article 2(a) of Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data must be interpreted as meaning that a dynamic IP address registered by an online media services provider when a person accesses a website that the provider makes accessible to the public constitutes personal data within the meaning of that provision, in relation to that provider, where the latter has the legal means which enable it to identify the data subject with additional data which the internet service provider has about that person.

Additionally, from a cursory read, it appears like they are only talking about dynamic IP addresses anyway, but you, as a service operator, have no way of knowing if an IP is dynamic or static.

Re:I Spent $6M on Google Ads Last Year by nabeards on Tuesday April 28, 2020 @01:51PM (#23009749)
This is the key: ...where the latter has the legal means which enable it to identify the data subject with additional data which the internet service provider has about that person
Re:I Spent $6M on Google Ads Last Year by sdenton4 on Monday April 27, 2020 @01:19PM (#22997806)
Imagine you walk into a grocery store and pick up a rewards card to save N%. To get it, you have to give a phone number. If you write down your phone number, you've handed over some PII. If you write down a fake number, it's still legally PII, but has been anonymized, so the store won't be able to find you.
Re:I Spent $6M on Google Ads Last Year by martindevans on Monday April 27, 2020 @03:02PM (#22998830)
The original comments was about detecting if a given IP is a bot or not - I assume they probably can't do that given 32 random bits!
Re:I Spent $6M on Google Ads Last Year by LunaSea on Monday April 27, 2020 @03:44PM (#22999231)
You can simply truncate the IP address and remove the last block (byte).
Re:I Spent $6M on Google Ads Last Year by bravura on Monday April 27, 2020 @04:50PM (#22999890)
Just curious if you can contact me or, better, put contact information in your profile.