News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by londons_explore on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @08:53AM (#22944979)
Undersea cable is pretty unreliable. Most major cables expect to break every few years.

Usually breaks are caused by humans (ships pulling anchors, sabotage/spying). Sometimes they're natural (caused by wildlife, ocean floor movement, flaws in the cable design).

Fixes usually take a few hours if they happen at the endpoints, or weeks if they happen somewhere under the ocean.

Interestingly, spying breaks always involve three simultaneous breaks in the cable. The cable is broken at two points, and then broken at a third point in the middle to put spy equipment. They do this so the people operating the cable can't tell where the spy equipment was inserted, since otherwise you can tell where a cable is broken or being tampered with by sending light down the cable and seeing how long before light reflects off the broken bit and comes back to the end.

Using statistical methods, you can see how frequently you'd expect a cable to break at different points along it's length simultaneously, and it happens a lot more than raw chance would suggest.

Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by bogomipz on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @12:36PM (#22947406)
>"Undersea cable is pretty unreliable."

This is not true. Submarine cable installations generally have a lifespan of 20-25 years although that's even being extended now to 30 years with advances in WDM gear. Also in water deeper than 1500 meters the cables are typically laid on the ocean floor. This is done because it is beyond the limit of trawl fishing anchors.

>"Interestingly, spying breaks always involve three simultaneous breaks in the cable. The cable is broken at two points, and then broken at a third point in the middle to put spy equipment."

Yeah this is not true at all. Where did you get this from? Fiber cables can be tapped by simply adding a bend radius to the cable which allows it to leak. [1], Further you can shoot a light down both ends of a fiber and easily discern that there is more than one break in the cable.

[1] https://www.thefoa.org/tech/ref/appln/tap-fiber.html

Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by illvm on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @11:54AM (#22946912)
> since otherwise you can tell where a cable is broken or being tampered with by sending light down the cable and seeing how long before light reflects off the broken bit and comes back to the end.

IIRC at BSidesLV last year there was a vendor selling optical splicing modules which were rather difficult to detect using this technique.

Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by oldsklgdfth on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @09:25AM (#22945274)
I was under the impression that underwater cables were fairly reliable, but it seems they require frequent repair.

Per wikipedia: > Still, cable breaks are by no means a thing of the past, with more than 50 repairs a year in the Atlantic alone,[48] and significant breaks in 2006, 2008, and 2009.

Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by anthony_doan on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @10:39AM (#22946038)
> caused by wildlife

Can you further explain this part? It sounds so out there with undersea cable.

The only thing I can think of is that wildfire cause erosion in soil which wash off into the sea and damage the end point?

Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by londons_explore on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @10:46AM (#22946095)
Wildlife, not wildfire!

Things like a whale getting entangled in it, and then using all its strength to get free, breaking the cable.

Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by koheripbal on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @12:36PM (#22947405)
I don't see how a whale would get caught in a cable that's laying on the ocean floor. They don't float.
Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by londons_explore on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @01:51PM (#22948263)
When the cable goes over mountain ranges and cliffs and valleys on the ocean floor, it can end up thousands of feet from the bottom sometimes.
Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by bogomipz on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @04:42PM (#22949981)
You appear to just be making stuff up.

Submarine cable is buried when it's at depths of 2000 Meters or less. It is done so using jet-plow technology. Beyond depths of 2000 meters the cable simply sinks to floor and rests there. It most certainly does not hang across a valley the way high tension power lines do above ground. Also cable routes are carefully planned to avoid trenches wherever possible. Where that's not possible it's simply sunk by its' own weight down to the ocean floor.

Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by gen3 on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @10:44AM (#22946078)
Think of shark biting at cable, etc. Remember these cables just sit on top of the ocean floor.
Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by a012 on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @10:54AM (#22946168)
Do you know how thick these submarine cables are?
Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by londons_explore on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @11:25AM (#22946541)
Most importantly, once a shark gnaws at the cable, various waterproofing and weatherproofing layers get broken, and seawater goes deep inside the cable, then corrosion happens, breaking things further...
Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by dfox on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @02:42PM (#22948810)
The cable is absurdly thick and absurdly armored only in shallow waters near the landing point (ie. where it is expected to be affected by stuff like boat anchors). In open ocean the cable is actually surprisingly thin for how robust it is.
Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by teuna on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @11:01AM (#22946263)
there are videos out there, sharks like to bite those cables
Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by user5994461 on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @09:59AM (#22945601)
Isn't it heavily depending on the location of the cable?

I'd expect cables in shallow water in fishing areas to be broken more often than deep floating cables in the middle of the Atlantic.

Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by abnry on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @09:47AM (#22945474)
Do you have any references about these spying breaks? This is the first I've heard of it and it is fascinating.
Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by ForHackernews on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @10:21AM (#22945839)
https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/07/th...

I've never heard that they break the cables, but rather "bend" them so that light leaks out of the fibre.

Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by jlgaddis on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @04:00PM (#22949562)
It seems that'd be pretty easy to do that with, e.g., a few strands of SMF running across a datacenter, but I'd imagine it's a bit more difficult to "bend" a bundle of, say, 144 strands that are encased in a few inches of copper and steel, no?
Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by rhacker on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @09:57AM (#22945585)
What's the point of spying on traffic you can't read?
Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by ashtonkem on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @10:11AM (#22945738)
Metadata is incredibly useful in its own right, and spy agencies regularly record huge amounts of data in the hope that they can decrypt it in the future.
Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by goatinaboat on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @02:07PM (#22948433)
Even if you can’t read a single packet, noting a surge in bandwidth utilisation is a signal in and of itself. But you probably can read the headers.
Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by alexis_fr on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @10:17AM (#22945798)
Maybe the NSA can decrypt RSA or Diffie-Hellman. We don’t know. Maybe they save it for when they’ll get the keys. Another way is to saturate so much the network with spy equipment that it’s futile to search and remove it.
Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by michaelt on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @10:37AM (#22946016)
Plenty of unencrypted traffic still around - connections between datacentres via dedicated fibers, phone calls, SMS messages, e-mails....
Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by jlgaddis on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @04:02PM (#22949588)
"We kill people based on metadata."

-- Gen. Michael Hayden (retired), former Director of both the CIA and NSA.

Re:Facebook agreed to censor posts after Vietnam slowed traf... by ikiris on Wednesday April 22, 2020 @12:45PM (#22947516)
"Ssl added and removed here".

Not everyone treats long haul as secure until they learn the hard way. Few are big enough to find out.