Someone probably thought the title was too provocative and therefore more likely to touch off the usual back and forth between

-- those who feel they have to evangelize remote work so that there will be more/better paid remote positions for them and

-- those who really hate the current situation (who doesn't) and are worried that not coming into the office will be normalized and many of their co-workers will stop coming in as a result

> those who really hate the current situation (who doesn't)

<raises hand>, in the context of this report. 100% WFH fine with me. Not being able to go just buy local stuff when I want I'm not so keen on, but that's not what this is about.

In my case, I'm almost fully remote but I also usually travel about a third of the time--so I'm a bit stir-crazy. I just meant that it's overall a stressful situation for a lot of people which makes remote tougher overall.

Probably just took the name out as per HN guidelines:

> If the title includes the name of the site, please take it out, because the site name will be displayed after the link.

hey, check this out, it came up before: https://hackernewstitles.netlify.app

sometimes the reasons don't make sense to me even though people say they do.

Too preposterous, perhaps?