new_here
Perhaps Atlassian was sitting on cash and needed to make some bets. If you can build a big enough user base for a browser it can earn handsomely from AdWords type referral fees. Look at what Google pays Apple to be default on Safari and how much referral spend Chrome recouped for Google etc. Maybe Atlassian will try and promote Dia to its customer base and look to launch more AI type commercial product discovery experiences like Perplexity Shopping.
You either die an MVP or live long enough to build content moderation: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28684250
Congrats on the milestone!
The issue is with the intentional misleading of people to think their device is slowing down when they just need a battery replacement. At Apple’s scale it’s significant and dishonest towards its customers.
Tell HN: Apple Is Still Throttling iPhones
Noticed my iPhone 12 mini was becoming annoyingly sluggish when searching, launching apps etc. Checked battery health and it was at 87%. Just received phone back from a battery replacement and device performance feels brand new.The iPhone battery health screen (and the learn more page linked to from it) makes several mentions of how Apple's battery management system aims to reduce performance...
I've also used Redmine a few years ago. It gets the job done but nowhere near as slick and fun to use.
Doesn't Google already consider that if a user returns to the results page (or clicks a second link) then the first link visited was not satisfactory. Seems like a pretty elegant solution.
I originally thought they were trying to cache account data responses and so wondered why they wouldn't just use unique query parameters in that case. Definitely risky business though.
Out of interest, it looks like Cloudflare offers some sort of token authentication to authenticate at the edge: https://blog.cloudflare.com/token-authentication-for-cached-...
I guess I didn't think of that originally because I thought if you wanted to cache some kind of response data like this, why on earth would you use a generic URL? But perhaps they probably didn't intend to cache this endpoint.
In my limited experience working with CDNs wouldn't you just cache the responses of unique URLs and have some sort of cookie check at the edge before serving it.
So my own app would request something like /api/account?id=123 with my own id in there.
How would you end up getting other people's data in your app if your app only calls that unique URL?
There are quite a few competitors popping up, the main issue is that they all seem to be bootstrapped and don't have the funding to make a disruptive marketing splash.
- 105 requests
- 3.9MB transferred
- 13.9MB resources
- 32.57s load time
Here's a nice repo of other examples: https://github.com/dominictarr/your-web-app-is-bloated
FY18/19 - under $10bn profit
FY19/20 - $314.7bn profit (3/4 of Ireland's GDP) and paid no tax on it.
> The subsidiary, which collects licence fees for use of copyrighted Microsoft software around the world, recorded an annual profit of $314.7bn in the year to the end of June 2020, according to accounts filed at the Irish Companies Registration Office. Its profits jumped from just under $10bn the previous year and compare with Ireland’s 2020 GDP of €357bn ($437bn).
> Tax transparency campaigners described the “tax aggression displayed by Microsoft, and facilitated by Ireland” as “beyond belief”.
Once the novelty wore off and I'd got into the work day commute all I noticed was how filthy and over-crowded it is, and how nothing works. Too hot, too cold, too much snow or too much rain and trains don't run which causes a massive backlog of people and delays. It takes 40 min to get anywhere and there are frequently obstacles during your journeys (signal failures etc). You live in the same town but never see some of your friends because it is such a saga to get there and back. I worked in Leicester Square and could not get proper mobile signal there most of the time. Moving apartments is super stressful and estate agents gouge you every step of the way. Doing any sort of admin in that town is an absolute nightmare.
The restaurants are some of the best in the world but most of the time you need to book at least two weeks in advance, so there is almost zero chance of spontaneity. While restaurants are a bit pricey it's a 50% chance of being mediocre or the best meal of your life. Not to mention every time you sit down you are reminded that your two hour time limit on the table has started. Any exciting band or festival has tickets that sell out in seconds.
I also felt that interactions with people could often be a fine line between sarcasm and being patronising. A lot of my friends raved about London 10 years ago (and I believe them) but most have now left or are wanting to.
It's a shame though, London seems like it can be a great city but is being crushed under the weight of all the people and honestly the quality of life I experienced there was just not that good. It really feels like too many people have moved there and it's become a bit of a tragedy of commons situation.
Sorry to be a downer but I really feel that London gets a lot of hype and from my experience doesn't seem justified in its current state. So just wanted to share some of my experiences.
Was it a malicious email attachment that propagated through unsecured networks or outdated OS versions? And what data was encrypted? Are we talking regular excel files or actual databases?
It would be interesting to have some more detail or case studies so others could know how to fortify infection points and limit the blast radius of their own systems.
High contrast text can appear blurred for them while reading.
Data Manipulation: Polars vs. Rust
Then there other parts of town (.io, .co, .app and so on) which become gentrified and increase in value as people move into them and start doing fresh things.
I once pondered taking out a business loan to acquire a particular .com domain, thinking of it as a mortgage. The thinking was that once it's been acquired you can run your business from that prime property instantly and pay that asset off each month. Then one day if you ever had to sell it you could probably get the same or more for it, provided you hadn't overpaid initially.
Data Manipulation: Pandas vs. Rust
Remuneration is the equilibrium of what a company is willing to buy at and what the worker is willing to sell at. A worker will want a higher price and a company will want a lower price. If they agree at an equilibrium then an employment contract is signed.
Manufacturers have leverage to lowball the salaries of workers because if a worker declines to sell their labour at a low price, then the company can likely find other sellers because there is a large supply of unskilled labour.
But if the supply of a specialised labourer is limited and the company really needs it, then the company has to consider more carefully if they want to pass on the deal or if they want to buy the labour at a higher price.
If Facebook now chooses to pay lower salaries based on the cost of living of a worker's location, then that is their risk to take as they'll open themselves up to more competition. It's up to the remote worker to decide if they want to sell their labour to Facebook at that price or if they're comfortable to decline and look at their other options, which depends on the demand for remote workers of their particular skill set.
The great thing about the internet is that if you think it's missing something, you can build it! I've been working on my own tech community called Able (https://able.bio) in my spare time for about 3 years now. I'd like it to be an intersection of software, hardware and business but with less cynicism and self-hype of other places. Just a place to appreciate the merits of human ingenuity. You're welcome to come hang out there if you like.
But yeah, if anyone knows of any other communities I'd also be interested to check them out. I feel like a bit of variety would be nice at the moment.
> they grow almost 70 kilograms (154 pounds) of tomatoes per square meter. That's at least 10 times the average yield from an open field in Spain or Morocco, but with eight times less water and practically no chemical pesticides.
A promising method with a yield like this shouldn't be abandoned just because the taste isn't as good. This is just something the market will force them to improve, if customers don't continue to buy them. Personally, I've never tasted a tomato that I would label as atrocious so I'm now intrigued to try them :)