Re:'Call of Duty' wins First Amendment victory over use of H...
by ceejayoz on Thursday April 02, 2020 @07:23PM
(#22764903)
That’s just if you want them to pay for the product placement, though.
Re:'Call of Duty' wins First Amendment victory over use of H...
by Supermancho on Thursday April 02, 2020 @08:50PM
(#22765401)
If you want to use it at all in a movie or tv.
Re:'Call of Duty' wins First Amendment victory over use of H...
by hannasanarion on Thursday April 02, 2020 @09:44PM
(#22765668)
Apple can't stop you from using their products in a movie. Trademarks only protect brand confusion, nobody is going to watch Transformers 17: Age of Voltron and think that the whole movie is an apple product because a robot turns into a iPad.
It's just a case of "if you don't use our product this way, we won't do cross promotions or pay for product placement with you anymore"
Re:'Call of Duty' wins First Amendment victory over use of H...
by Supermancho on Friday April 03, 2020 @12:01AM
(#22766221)
Apple does not do product placement at all, so licensing fees make no sense for Apple. I stand corrected.
Re:'Call of Duty' wins First Amendment victory over use of H...
by ceejayoz on Friday April 03, 2020 @08:57AM
(#22768707)
They absolutely do, just not in the standard way.
https://www.businessinsider.com/apple-product-placements-in-...
They give away devices, to studio, cast, and crew. Apple puts your movie prominently in ads or on the iTunes Store. etc.
* SPOILER AHEAD *
While Apple will let you use an iPhone on film, they won't approve it being used by a villain.