Till shade is gone,
Till water is gone,
Into the shadow with teeth bared,
Screaming defiance with the last breath,
To spit in Sightblinder's eye on the last day.
I suppose the Mark Watney "Keep solving problems" is more in keeping with the HN zeitgeist. Ah well.Even brief nuclear winter would cause billion of deaths from starvation (and chaos caused by collapsing economy).
I just wonder if we have a plan B to rebuild stuff (relatively) quickly or humans will be thrown into preindustrial world condemned to reinvent everything again?
There's a ton of them. You can google "prepper community".
IMHO all of them tend to underestimate the cleverness of the remaining humans; i.e., holing up in a cabin in the mountains with a metric ton of freezedried food won't help when you've got people with a metric ton of freezedried motivation to find you.
It doesn't matter how much planning you do; such plans would not survive contact with the enemy anyhow.
I stick to the regular amounts of prep I've been advising anyhow. It helps even if such a worst-case occurs and gives you time to plan your next move, which is all you can really ask for anyhow.
To close out on a happier note, it isn't even all bad news, and it may be getting better over time. Even a catastrophic collapse of civilization could still leave you with a lot more resources than you'd expect, as society gets wealthier over time. For instance, every house that has solar panels on it is just a few components away from being able to provide small, but potentially vital, amounts of power, power that will have all sorts of uses. It may not be fun but people may surprise you with what even the "shattered remnants" of civilization can do. After all, we bootstrapped once already with none of that stuff.
The MERS virus was much more deadly than this thing, and that wasn't very long ago. The problem with it was that it was too deadly: it killed people off pretty quickly. Pathogens that are highly deadly usually aren't very good at starting plagues, because they kill off their hosts too quickly and for that reason don't spread that much. This one is worse because it has a really long incubation period with few or no symptoms and then does its thing, but still with a relatively low mortality rate.
I guess what would really cause civilization to collapse would be a virus that has a very long incubation time with no symptoms, and then sudden very high mortality.
It's killed millions but still hasn't wiped out civilization.
Such plans are inherently unpalletable.
The right answer would be murder 90% of the population to sustain the resources for the 10% during the recovery.
How many people are game for that?
I choose the 10% and continuity of civilization over 100% and complete destruction of society. And if I'm in the 90% .... I'll be pissed, but what needs to be done must be done.
In WW2 sailors sealed themselves up below the waterline to save the ship at certain doom to themselves.
The universe is an ugly place... But to see the light of humanity possibly extinguished is a worse prospect for me personally.
A civilization ending asteroid is going to miss us! https://www.space.com/asteroid-1998-or2-earth-flyby-april-20...