News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by llarsson on Friday February 14, 2020 @03:07AM (#22324829)
https://t.me/s/libretaxi_all

A public feed of all rides? Who in their right mind would want the world to know that they are leaving for the airport? Or publicly give out their home address?

Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by ORioN63 on Friday February 14, 2020 @04:45AM (#22325245)
If I'm understanding this correctly, this is the equivalent of the "taxi radio". Taxi drivers without a current ride or on a short one, can listen to it. They usually talk to a centralized office, but also amongst themselves. i.e. Ask for advice going somewhere, warn about accidents, etc.

It's a great idea for Taxi's (the radio).

I'll hold my opinion on this software.

Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by speedgoose on Friday February 14, 2020 @03:22AM (#22324902)
It's not very GDPR compliant either.
Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by mikeq101101 on Friday February 14, 2020 @03:47AM (#22324999)
And that is a good thing.
Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by BiteCode_dev on Friday February 14, 2020 @03:49AM (#22325005)
You mean it's bad for users to be legally equiped to be able to request what data is collected from them ?
Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by rendall on Friday February 14, 2020 @05:56AM (#22325566)
And legally, formally deny permission for data collection, apparently. I don't know why people are against this.

I also don't know why the parent post is getting down-voted. HN can be harsh.

Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by messe on Friday February 14, 2020 @10:14AM (#22327209)
There's a segment of HN that's very anti-regulation.
Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by RomanPushkin on Friday February 14, 2020 @09:26AM (#22326783)
You're broadcasting your address to people around when you're looking for ride. Unsafe? I think it's much safer than anonymous rides through Telegram platform. If you have any ideas besides criticism you're welcome to contribute.
Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by arianestrasse on Friday February 14, 2020 @06:12AM (#22325630)
OP could've spent 5 minutes to write a bit of a description of what this is, as not everyone has Telegram installed or wants to run some random guy's code to figure out what they're dealing with.
Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by wyxuan on Friday February 14, 2020 @01:26AM (#22324394)
Basically a telegram bot that helps facilitate rides between drivers and passengers
Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by _-___________-_ on Friday February 14, 2020 @01:18AM (#22324363)
The description refers to this as a "ridesharing jailbreak". What does that mean?
Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by seanhunter on Friday February 14, 2020 @02:21AM (#22324638)
It's a decentralised solution joining would-be serial sex offenders with potential victims. (Only partially joking)

The externalities of the existing taxi licensing systems are not perfect, but removing even the quasi-accountability of a corporate entity like Uber seems worse.

Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by RomanPushkin on Friday February 14, 2020 @09:32AM (#22326837)
Exactly this. One serial killer in comments above isn't happy about public feed and wait it to be more secure (only partially joking).

Good news is you have source code now and author who is happy to accept improvements. Please improve accountability and safety - you can't do it with entities like Uber probably.

Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by RL_Quine on Friday February 14, 2020 @10:35AM (#22327388)
Uh, are you seriously equating someone commenting on the lack of privacy with the them being a serial killer?
Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by Arbalest on Friday February 14, 2020 @01:27AM (#22324395)
It's not clear, if this is a replacement Uber Client, or a whole new decentralised infrastructure for being an unlicenced taxi. Looks like it might be the latter.
Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by wyxuan on Friday February 14, 2020 @01:25AM (#22324389)
Ride-sharing model but better in their view
Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by knocte on Friday February 14, 2020 @01:33AM (#22324421)
Is it based on GPS locations?
Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by calciphus on Friday February 14, 2020 @01:47AM (#22324476)
It is a technical solution that lacks a network effect or regulatory OR people component
Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by beering on Friday February 14, 2020 @02:14AM (#22324595)
It also seems to be lacking the technical component as I didn't seem to find any dispatching logic (e.g. geospatial awareness).
Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by Kaze404 on Friday February 14, 2020 @07:58AM (#22326114)
Isn't that what Uber is? The people component only exists when they're trying to manipulate customers into thinking they care about anyone. If you actually try and get support over being harassed by drivers for example, you get to see the real Uber.
Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by Hnrobert42 on Friday February 14, 2020 @08:52AM (#22326465)
No. Your criticisms of Uber aside, the poster notes that this lacks the network effect that Uber uses.
Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by derrick_jensen on Friday February 14, 2020 @10:56AM (#22327563)
What legal protections do you have, and what are you liable for as a company? Is this meant to be used in major markets, or only in societies with high levels of stranger trust like Japan? Are you trying to compete on price on the third world? No offense but I have no idea why somebody will use this
Re:LibreTaxi 2 published, open-source Uber PoC by RomanPushkin on Sunday February 16, 2020 @11:05AM (#22342113)
It's the same legal protections you have when you make a post at Craigslist rideshare.