CalTech wins $1.1B jury verdict in patent case against Apple, Broadcom

Re:CalTech wins $1.1B jury verdict in patent case against Ap... by BalinKing on Thursday January 30, 2020 @08:45PM (#22198212)

It’s honestly really sad that even _professional_ journalists don’t know how to spell it correctly :-(

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CalTech wins $1.1B jury verdict in patent case against Ap... by tzs on Thursday January 30, 2020 @10:42PM (#22198827)

Heck, they even copy/pasted from a Caltech statement which includes "Caltech" twice, so they had the correct spelling literally right in front of their faces on their screens as they wrote the story:

> “We are pleased the jury found that Apple and Broadcom infringed Caltech patents,” CalTech said in a statement. “As a non-profit institution of higher education, Caltech is committed to protecting its intellectual property in furtherance of its mission to expand human knowledge and benefit society through research integrated with education.”

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CalTech wins $1.1B jury verdict in patent case against Ap... by WalterBright on Thursday January 30, 2020 @10:41PM (#22198822)

https://www.caltech.edu/ tells the tale.

I've never seen it spelled CalTech in anything from the university nor from any techer.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CalTech wins $1.1B jury verdict in patent case against Ap... by brokensegue on Friday January 31, 2020 @01:53AM (#22199672)

"CalTech" used to be correct

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CalTech wins $1.1B jury verdict in patent case against Ap... by HHest on Friday January 31, 2020 @04:47AM (#22200357)

Reference?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CalTech wins $1.1B jury verdict in patent case against Ap... by brokensegue on Friday January 31, 2020 @02:26PM (#22204711)

there are signs around campus that still use the old spelling.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CalTech wins $1.1B jury verdict in patent case against Ap... by selimthegrim on Saturday February 01, 2020 @12:54PM (#22211938)

The one on the exit ramp from the 210 doesn’t count

[ Parent | on HN ]