I've never been to Beijing but I have visited two of the other tier one cities and I can assure you wet markets still exist there.
I gather the one in Wuhan wasn't supposed to either, but either enforcement was lacking or they were paid to look the other way.
https://www.npr.org/2020/01/22/798644707/why-wet-markets-per...
One interesting point was they had tried to discourage these markets in the past and replace them with supermarkets, but people didn't want to switch. These markets offered food cheaper, people like them, they might offer opportunities to socialize, and they offer wild animals which are traditionally viewed as healthy and a sign of wealth.
Of course, the Chinese government can do a more authoritarian crackdown on it than what they tried in the past. Also, maybe this outbreak could change public opinion.
- Not really an expert, might be wrong.
30 years ago yes, but not anymore.
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.DDAY?locations=C...
Edit: typos
Also, the distance from the Wuhan wildlife market to the high-speed rail station is walking distance.
> “If we were to shut the wildlife markets, a lot of these outbreaks would be a thing of the past,” says Ian Lipkin, director of Columbia University’s Center for Infection and Immunity, whose lab worked with Chinese officials to develop early diagnostic tests for SARS.
> That’s because both SARS and the new outbreak are zoonotic, meaning these diseases started in animals before spreading to humans. Zoonotic diseases rank among the world’s most infamous. HIV, Ebola, and H5N1 influenza, for example, all percolated in wildlife before close interactions with humans spawned international outbreaks. With SARS, food preparers and people who handled, killed, and sold wild animals made up nearly 40 percent of the first cases. The earliest episodes were also among people who were more likely to live within walking distance of wildlife markets.