News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:New coronavirus can spread between humans, but started in... by verroq on Saturday January 25, 2020 @02:05PM (#22147954)
Won’t that just drive it underground? Then nobody would even know where it started when the next outbreak happens.
Re:New coronavirus can spread between humans, but started in... by CydeWeys on Saturday January 25, 2020 @02:15PM (#22148021)
Don't underestimate how effectively a totalitarian and surveillance state like China can be in discouraging behaviors they don't want. People aren't willing to risk their lives just to eat exotic animals. And that could be what's at stake here; witness what happened to some of the people involved in the melamine baby milk formula scandal.
Re:New coronavirus can spread between humans, but started in... by verroq on Saturday January 25, 2020 @02:31PM (#22148123)
Seems like they are already risking their lives eating exotic animals.
Re:New coronavirus can spread between humans, but started in... by ddalex on Sunday January 26, 2020 @04:20AM (#22151224)
Thinking that the wild animals are more healthy
Re:New coronavirus can spread between humans, but started in... by csomar on Saturday January 25, 2020 @03:03PM (#22148326)
You can drive it underground because, I think, the problem is coming from having too many animals/people in a small crowded place. If people were to raise their own cattle it'd be much healthier[-].

- Not really an expert, might be wrong.

Re:New coronavirus can spread between humans, but started in... by apta on Sunday January 26, 2020 @08:29AM (#22151963)
That's a very western-centric view of things. I'm assuming trying to draw parallels from happened when the US tried alcohol prohibition, which failed partially due to government greed. These things can be effective in other cultures, especially when people believe in the cause (e.g. see how quickly and efficiently alcohol consumption practically ceased overnight in Islamic history).