News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Actix project postmortem by tiku on Friday January 17, 2020 @08:28AM (#22074399)
Once it's public and people depend on it you can't retract it like that. His goal was to make his work public, not private.
Re:Actix project postmortem by captainbland on Friday January 17, 2020 @08:52AM (#22074578)
You basically can. The cost of free stuff like this is "be nice to the guy giving it to you" or at least don't be actively abusive about it. If the community won't pay that price, expect it to evaporate.
Re:Actix project postmortem by majewsky on Friday January 17, 2020 @09:46AM (#22074988)
> The cost of free stuff is "be nice to the guy giving it to you".

Can I get this on a poster please? Really well put.

Re:Actix project postmortem by mratsim on Friday January 17, 2020 @08:51PM (#22081611)
This goes both way though. Be nice when people submit patches especially when you reject them.

The abusive comment seems to have been a knee-jerk response from someone dissatisfied by the "it's boring" comment about a proof-of-concept patch.

Re:Actix project postmortem by Touche on Friday January 17, 2020 @08:44AM (#22074525)
You can retract it. He just did it. You can take down any webpage under your control. I could delete this comment later if I like. You could delete yours. etc.
Re:Actix project postmortem by saagarjha on Friday January 17, 2020 @08:47AM (#22074549)
> I could delete this comment later if I like.

Now you can’t.

Re:Actix project postmortem by fouc on Friday January 17, 2020 @08:35AM (#22074467)
The point of open source is that people can maintain their own forks etc. There's plenty of mirrors of actix I'm sure.
Re:Actix project postmortem by siscia on Friday January 17, 2020 @08:33AM (#22074444)
Why?
Re:Actix project postmortem by saagarjha on Friday January 17, 2020 @08:44AM (#22074528)
It’s no longer “his” code.