captainbland

I guess the awkward question then is do humans really do anything other than parrot the ideas of sentience or are they somehow more real because a human learned from others to say them?

My thought is you could probably set up something similar with today's technological capabilities but it would probably take decades to train and be expensive to develop which is commercially unacceptable.

A point of interest for me is how they end up counting basically anything as working hours because the barrier between work and life has effectively dissolved. Elon Musk for example seems to spend an inordinate amount of time shitposting for someone who claims to work up to 100 hours a week.

But precisely that such "work" is totally self directed makes it significantly different from other forms of work in that it's totally self-defined and practically any activity could be captured within that definition.

So a lot of this mythos of long hours from the wealthy I think is just empty status building for the most part.

In general though you do have to figure that vulnerable and naive people will use it because of the degree of market penetration they're aiming for, including minors etc. and they have some responsibility around that.

I guess it's not really a benchmark but you could say if it can do it faster it sort of could be taken as one.

I'm not sure "competition" is necessarily the right word but I don't think that model creators and their political backers have a leg to stand on when complaining about distillation.

From an outside mass/gravity point of view these are similar right? Yet the holographic universe theory seems to say we should be able to differentiate between the two sets of dolls purely based on space-time observations of the surface of the outer doll, despite each system having identical gravitational properties when viewed externally?

But doesn't that suggest a contradiction between this theory and what we have observed about gravity?