Re:Cable Haunt: A critical vulnerability found in cable modems
by doomrobo on Monday January 13, 2020 @09:18AM
(#22034615)
But being an ordinary relay means you are still being used as a hop for people to connect to hidden services. Do you think hidden services are less ethically dubious than clearnet services?
Re:Cable Haunt: A critical vulnerability found in cable modems
by heydabop on Monday January 13, 2020 @11:13AM
(#22035663)
I think you're misunderstanding their argument. They don't want to be an exit node because they don't want to share their public IP (liability), nor do they want to be a relay because they don't want to help route to hidden services (ethics).
Re:Cable Haunt: A critical vulnerability found in cable modems
by londons_explore on Monday January 13, 2020 @07:07PM
(#22040264)
You pay your taxes used to pay for bombs to kill people.
Sometimes you have to look at the big picture when making ethical decisions.
Re:Cable Haunt: A critical vulnerability found in cable modems
by LeonM on Tuesday January 14, 2020 @08:27AM
(#22044502)
> You pay your taxes used to pay for bombs to kill people.
Paying tax is mandatory, unlike installing a tor node on your modem.
Re:Cable Haunt: A critical vulnerability found in cable modems
by driverdan on Monday January 13, 2020 @06:30PM
(#22039973)
Based on that argument we shouldn't have the internet because some users will do unethical things with it.
It's not just liability, for me it's also ethics. It gives me piece of mind that I am not contributing towards these practices.