I'm not sure what houses look like in Hanoi but if they are kind of like the 3-5 storey houses in some parts of East Asia those are not great designs. They’re like twenty feet wide and forty feet long with steep stairs connecting the floors. To me the layout is awful. It wouldn’t be bad for one off where the lot was oddly shaped but to have that as a default for attached homes isn’t great.

Twenty feet wide and fourty feet long is like 6x12 meters per floor.

That’s as big as my entire house, and we can fit 4 rooms, a kitchen and a bathroom in there.

2.5 rooms per floor would be the height of luxury.

Why do you say these are terrible?

I would say it because I've spent time on crutches, I have a parent in a wheelchair and another one that just wouldn't have the energy for a staircase much of the time, and staircases are a pain in the neck with small children and make it harder to move appliances and large items of furniture in and out. As a default form of housing, living across four floors is actively excluding many people with disabilities and massively reduces the ability of aging seniors to manage unassisted living.

These sound like complaints against any house with stairs. I think that disqualifies like 95% of all stock regardless.

I think we’d find that the number of people that need single floor apartments fairly closely follows the available supply.

If the first floor apartment had ramp access then wheelchairs could get in. Elevators are another option but somewhat expensive.

It seems like the solution to that would be to use multiple types of housing construction within the same city, and then people can choose one suitable to their situation. And to make other sensible choices like to put heavy appliances on the ground floor.

Yes. The comment you responded to earlier said "It wouldn’t be bad for one off where the lot was oddly shaped but to have that as a default for attached homes isn’t great."

And what I'm saying is the opposite. It's fine for it to be common as long as there are still enough single floor dwellings for the people who need them.

There should be all kinds of everything. A city should be a massively diverse cacophony of individual choices. That means that finding exactly what you want is going to exclude >90% of the properties -- but means that finding exactly what you want is going to be possible.

Like I mentioned, the layouts aren't great --unless-- it's one designed by a known architect then they can at least look nice from the outside, yet they are still constrained by the dimensions --which can be from 12-foot wide to about 20-foot, in most cases. Here[1] is a sample of stock that's about 30yo. in the background you can see the roofline of a newer design.

[1]https://imgur.com/a/pdHmByZ

For the whole house I hope...

It was $750 for a three bedroom near WPI in 1992. Ours had left over (disconnected) gas jet lighting, sliding wooden pocket doors for one of the living rooms and a separate entrance for one of the bedrooms (for maid I think). You could see where chimney for the original coal stove in the kitchen was. Also had a slate roof.

Fellow WPI grad, in 2012 I paid 275/person/month for an admittedly crappy apartment that I shared with 4 people, and later on 475/person/month for a room in a nicely renovated 3 story house right next to campus shared with 5-6 people. This one didn't have that many remnants except for an ironing board in the kitchen that plopped out of a wall closet, and a button next to the stairs indoors that said, ominously, "Sedgwick". It seemingly did nothing. We never figured out who or what Sedgwick was. We made sure to press it every so often, to "feed the Sedgwick" :-)

> I and some other students are currently paying $4350/mo for one of these triple deckers that you mentioned.

Because you're competing with Boston money. The fact that it's possible to live in Worcester and work in Boston (and the fact that Worcester is known for being nicer than New Bedford/Fall River and Fitchburg/Leominster) means there's tons of working professionals who are jacking up prices.