Re:Things that are illegal to build in most American cities now
by lazyasciiart on Tuesday December 10, 2019 @08:40PM
(#21758768)
I would say it because I've spent time on crutches, I have a parent in a wheelchair and another one that just wouldn't have the energy for a staircase much of the time, and staircases are a pain in the neck with small children and make it harder to move appliances and large items of furniture in and out. As a default form of housing, living across four floors is actively excluding many people with disabilities and massively reduces the ability of aging seniors to manage unassisted living.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Things that are illegal to build in most American cities now
by Aeolun on Wednesday December 11, 2019 @04:17AM
(#21760855)
These sound like complaints against any house with stairs. I think that disqualifies like 95% of all stock regardless.
I think we’d find that the number of people that need single floor apartments fairly closely follows the available supply.
Re:Things that are illegal to build in most American cities now
by zip1234 on Wednesday December 11, 2019 @08:08AM
(#21761998)
If the first floor apartment had ramp access then wheelchairs could get in. Elevators are another option but somewhat expensive.
Re:Things that are illegal to build in most American cities now
by AnthonyMouse on Wednesday December 11, 2019 @12:46AM
(#21759924)
It seems like the solution to that would be to use multiple types of housing construction within the same city, and then people can choose one suitable to their situation. And to make other sensible choices like to put heavy appliances on the ground floor.
Re:Things that are illegal to build in most American cities now
by lazyasciiart on Wednesday December 11, 2019 @03:25AM
(#21760594)
Yes. The comment you responded to earlier said "It wouldn’t be bad for one off where the lot was oddly shaped but to have that as a default for attached homes isn’t great."
Re:Things that are illegal to build in most American cities now
by AnthonyMouse on Wednesday December 11, 2019 @01:43PM
(#21765438)
And what I'm saying is the opposite. It's fine for it to be common as long as there are still enough single floor dwellings for the people who need them.
There should be all kinds of everything. A city should be a massively diverse cacophony of individual choices. That means that finding exactly what you want is going to exclude >90% of the properties -- but means that finding exactly what you want is going to be possible.