We've had to ask you repeatedly in the past not to break the site guidelines. Would you please review them and stick to the rules when posting here?
If there is healthy competition among employers then workers have a real choice. If not then declining your money could mean: live destitute or starve.
As companies consolidate and collude (intentionally or subconsciously) even cushy office workers may face exploitation.
I own a sewing machine and I choose to sew clothes on it myself then sell it. Am I exploiting myself?
I own a sewing machine and I choose to not hire anybody to operate it and it sits unused. Someone that could operate it is sitting unemployed and unable to eat even though I could hire them. Am I exploiting someone?
I own a sewing machine and offer someone an amount of money if they operate it and produce the clothing I ask them to produce. Am I exploiting them?
I'm glad fringe maniacs that consider employment exploitation aren't taken seriously.
As it should. If they don't accept your power, they starve (or not get healthcare if we're talking about contemporary USA).
How is that any less violent? Because when you kill someone by starvation it's less bloody? Your kind are already using violence against us, you're just good at not caring about others or lying to yourself.
Why do you mind if they have a say? If you don't plan on abusing and exploiting them, there's no harm, right?
EDIT: to put it into words I would think someone like you might understand better (power and money instead of empathy and solidarity) - because if you don't let them have a say, and exploit them, you might end up in a gulag, on guillotine or in wherever mass grave Mao put landlords.