"3 Dams to Be Removed in American West to Restore Rivers A new $50 million fund will help communities remove “deadbeat dams,” starting in California, Oregon, and Washington." https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2016/11/dam-removal-...
Not really, no.
You should take a look at how many people die due to coal, and how much long term environmental damage coal is responsible for.
Even in the worst case scenario of a Nuclear Accident, I would still rather that happen, than deal with the effects of coal.
Reactor design has changed significantly since Fukashima was built. Newer reactors are far safer.
I'm strongly in favor of traveling wave reactors. We need more tools for reducing, mitigating our stockpiles.
When the Hanford Nuclear Reservation's contaminants in the water table reach the Columbia River, everything downstream dies.
For me, any discussion about new civilian nuclear is fullstop until all the other aspects are addressed. Meanwhile, we prop up the nuclear power we have during the transition to wind, solar.
Also, do not forget that Fukashima is still an ongoing disaster that's only just recently begun to stabilize.