We get about 2x mailers per week from AMEX alone offering business loans of up to $500k, not to mention the many other offers we get less frequently.
I like Stripe and think the offer a great product, but I don't think they're doing this because no-one else will.
Even this specific type of loan, called a "Merchant Chash Advance" - exists, and isn't anything new: https://www.fundera.com/business-loans/merchant-cash-advance
> Based on the amount of junkmail I get offering my small business loans, I have a hard time believing the "filling a niche no-one else is offering" narrative.
Leaving aside questions about how good those lenders actually are to work with, it's still a surprisingly inefficient market. Businesses built on Stripe still report that access to capital is one of the _very top_ limiting factors on their growth. The uptake rates we've seen in the Stripe Capital beta over the past year corroborate this.
Our hypothesis is that existing lenders are disproportionately ineffective at detecting and underwriting internet businesses, since they have such different capital and growth dynamics.
Is that because you have a view into your business customers cash flows, so you think you'll be able to better assess risk than traditional lenders?
We were so struck by the extent of the problem reported by Stripe users, and by how that remained constant over time, that we decided to go tackle it directly.
Peter Thiel made an interesting point RE: one structural problem in the US economy being that lenders are giving consumers too much credit, but small businesses not enough.
Their entire existence has been built on that. They look for the burr in the saddle. If PayPal had not been so incompetent with their API, Stripe probably wouldn't have had enough of an angle in the beginning to gain broad traction among developers.
Probably hard to improve on that process, but it does look like they are just playing catch up in this small area of their business.
Stripe has a lot of goodwill - that goes a long way.
if you tried applying for one you would retract that statement and just upvote OP.
silly unexperienced reply
(disclosure: I work at Square, but not on Capital.)
A ton of entities supply capital to businesses today -- it's one of the largest markets in the world.
We aren't trying to beat anyone else. We're just responding to the need we heard from Stripe users for a product like this. I think how we do it (in terms of how we model the risk profiles of nascent, capital-light internet business; how we present it to customers; etc.) is all pretty neat. But the innovation, if we succeed, isn't going to be in how the mechanics compare to other products. It's going to be in not hearing from Stripe businesses that access to capital is one of their biggest limiting factors.
Square Capital takes only a few clicks to sign up, and loan offers automatically show up if you're already eligible [1], so this part of the offering is quite similar.
https://twitter.com/collision/status/1169660488374001664
> Since 2008, loans made to small businesses have decreased in absolute terms by 41%. Banks have been pulling back from SMB lending.
> When businesses can get a bank loan, they spend an average of 25 hours on paperwork and wait weeks or months for approval.
> For internet businesses, capital is vital to growth: for marketing spend, inventory, engineering, and much else.
> Stripe users report access to capital as one of the top factors affecting their growth.