I mean. Is the author naive? Gullible? Or just having a professional need to submit an article? C'mon. She's saying bad things about them. She's saying they're bad folks. And she's expecting them to not at least reply in kind?

The thing is that they ARE bad folks in much the same way that the Cigarette companies were and are bad folks. We needed people that are better folks than you or I that are capable and willing to suffer personal hardship to make the world a slightly less shitty place.

I dunno what the world needs. But i think its interesting that she thinks criticism is a 1 way street. She can criticise monsanto. Thats it?

Why are you so emotionally invested in defending an evil megacorp?

Am i? Have i? I only think that was a pointless article....she's surprised the tiger bit her after she poked it with a stick?

Why are you so worked up about the english grammar?